Monday, August 29, 2022

Censorship in Cartoons and Comics

How much of your cartoons and comics are censored? How much can content creators get away with and publishers let pass to the public? Today we're finding out. 

Courtesy of animatedtimes.com

Comic books have been legitimately censored for a long time. While there is a Marvel Knights category for only adults, the majority of it has to be acceptable to the public to be sold. Horror comics had a real heck of a time due to extensive censoring and not being able to use specific words. Even then, you can open a Green Arrow comic and find a bit more of Black Canary than you bargained for. It almost depends on the artist who made the book, if we're truly honest. Yet, I know that comics have been under specific standards for years. There are R-rated comic books (Deadpool and many more) out there. Some of them are not mainstream. 

As for cartoons, the 1980s and 1990s got a lot past the censors that kids wouldn't have even recognized. Adults, however, can immediately recognize it. I watched a Scooby Doo movie that literally explained Wicca. If you don't know Wicca you'd never have noticed (which none of my family did, so none of us did). Long story short, a lot can get inserted into kids' movies and cartoons that quite possibly shouldn't be there. Like comics, you can also get more than you bargained for. The difference in kids' movies is that it just happens to fly miles over a young child's head and land in the face of the parents. Comics are generally picked up by junior high age and up, making the content less likely to fly over their heads.

I will say this now and be done with it. Yes, pornography has made it into nearly every media form, including cartoons and comics. I will not be focusing on that aspect, but do want to acknowledge that it does exist and needs to be dealt with. 

Comics 

Comic books land all over the board on ratings. There are indeed genres (Marvel Knights, for example) that come with the expectation of less censorship. Moon Knight and Morbius are two examples of Marvel Knights characters, which were marketed to adults so they had to deal with less censoring. Forums online will tell you that plenty of nudity made it into comic books. Test that theory at your own risk. Dark plotlines in Batman tend to show up because of the Joker and several other violent criminals. Green Arrow can't keep his hands off Black Canary - or even finish dinner without losing self-control. There are adults who actually do want to see nude characters (hardly shocking after the pornography business has been so successful) and have talked about this on forums online, though they do think that those comic books should have a marked rating or some way of showing it contains adult content. 

Courtesy of centralrecorder.com
With all that, how can the comics possibly be censored? Well, it depends on what time your comic book was written. There was a time period of moral panic over comic books. McCarthyism (cold war panic) hit comic artists hard. Comics Code said what you could and couldn't put in your book after that point. Good had to win, the government was respected, and no divorce was allowed. Basically, it tied up comic artists and threw some of their creative ideas into the garbage can. It made it so that only kids could enjoy comics (which isn't true anymore). The 1930s to 1950s was a time of war and the cold war, making any comic entertainment that could distract the public a booming business. Look at Captain America and Wonder Woman, who both debuted in 1941. At that point, comics took off, but horror comics were extremely restricted for a long time due to pressure from church groups because parents thought they caused juvenile delinquency. People like Fredric Wertham made comics seem like they were sexually aggressive (though he was misguided) and people followed him. This was about the time Comics Code came about, cutting off the creativity of many artists for years to come. TV trying to take the place of comics didn't help. 

Here is a list of what the Comics Code said:

- a clear line between bad and good (good had to win)  - no sexy or nude images  
- no torture  - no werewolves, vampires, zombies, ghouls   - no slang or vulgar language
- no dealing with race or religious prejudice 

Courtesy of getwallpapers.com
In short, only superheroes really made it through this filter and that is why we see so much of it, instead of romance and western storylines. Batman was changed into the campy, kid-friendly character that inspired the old TV show, instead of the gritty character he'd been and is now. Underground comics came into being as a result of this code. The code's grip loosened as time marched on, but the code truly died when comic artists' publishers decided to sell to comic book stores themselves, dropping distributors and dropping the code on the way. In this way, it does depend on when the book was written, so today you'll see less filtering than you did in 1950. Frankly, you see less censoring as time marches on, anyway. 


Cartoons

There have been many content creators who constantly push the envelope on what they can slip past censors. What you also have to take into account is that adults have to watch movies with their kids. In short, you have to also entertain adults. Animaniacs, Spongebob, Rocko's Modern Life, Victorious, Fairly Odd Parents, Looney Tunes, Icarly, Hey Arnold, Rugrats, Johnny Bravo, Ed, Edd, and Eddy, Powerpuff Girls..... All these shows got adult jokes through the censors - and some did habitually. Rocko's Modern Life was a bunch of adult jokes crammed in with the hope that the censors wouldn't catch it. Half the time, they didn't. You'll notice that the cartoons aimed at adults are not listed here, because adults don't need as much censoring as kids' cartoons do. Go watch some of those shows and count how many times that innuendos made it in. Another notable one is Totally Spies, which I grew up on and own DVDs of. It has been called fetish fuel before (though a kid would never have noticed). I'll let Saberspark explain in the video below. 


Many cartoons have to get past censors to get released. Yes, cartoons got away with a lot (Looney Tunes especially), but there are some cartoons that Disney locked in a vault and you have to sign a paper to watch. Some are kept for historical purposes only, never to be released for public viewing again. The rating system is part of this system, ensuring you know what you are getting into when you put in that movie or turn on your TV. War cartoons got less censoring and it is not consistent, sometimes even hypocritical. War cartoons can sometimes make you cringe a bit. The military got training videos that show nude depictions of women. The thing is that censoring can happen post-production now, as opposed to prior permission after looking at the script. Creators lose some of their content without their permission. Kids' cartoons get this treatment most often. For the most part, we do rely on self-censoring (as parents and adults). What our society censors depends entirely on what our society finds appropriate, which explains why media doesn't always age gracefully. Censoring is also not catching everything, as proven by Rocko's Modern Life. 


Conclusions

What it all boils down to is this; what our society deems appropriate gets broadcasted or published more easily. I have always suspected that the 1950s cold war damaged our society by creating unnecessary rules. I keep finding proof of this in many ways, from gender rules that put us in boxes to rules that keep artists from releasing unique creations. It seems like cartoons didn't suffer as much as comics did. 

It is great advice to watch everything and read everything with your brain turned on. This doesn't mean you can't enjoy it; it simply means that you should know what messages are being broadcasted through your TV and any forms of media. Kids don't do this naturally, so do this for them as a parent. I don't advocate censorship that severely restricted comics into practically one genre, but I do believe there are some things kids shouldn't see. Be aware that censors don't catch everything in your kids' cartoons. Censorship will change with our society's whims. 







 https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/120201/has-any-marvel-or-dc-comic-ever-shown-graphic-nudity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erotic_comics

https://www.herogames.com/forums/topic/26842-nudity-and-sex-in-comics-books/

https://www.vox.com/2014/12/15/7326605/comic-book-censorship

https://the-artifice.com/comic-books-adults-history-stigmatization/

https://blogs.princeton.edu/mudd/2018/04/comic-books-censorship-and-moral-panic/

https://www.oif.ala.org/oif/spider-man-versus-censorship-short-history-comics-code/

Censorship in American Animation Essay Example For Students - 964 words | Artscolumbia

18 Things From Kids' Shows That Got Past Censors (screenrant.com)

24 Filthy Adult Jokes In Cartoons You Completely Missed As A Kid – Page 9 (whatculture.com)


Monday, August 22, 2022

Media Featuring Stay At Home Dads

Media that features stay-at-home dads is out there, from Johnny Test to The Incredibles. There is a movie titled Mr. Mom, as well. Is there still a stigma, or is it becoming more common as we work from home?

Courtesy of 123moviesweb.net


Stay-at-home parents are not uncommon, especially female parents. What we find in Johnny Test is that his dad is doing all the cooking, cleaning, and keeping track (if he even can after all they do) of the kids. He has to make sure the twins don't blow up the house and Johnny doesn't just let them do whatever they want to him (and we know how that works out). For those that don't know the TV show Johnny Test, it doesn't work out well and everything turns to chaos. Also, the mother comes home in a suit and skirt as if she's some sort of lawyer. Realizing that Johnny's dad is a stay-at-home made me wonder just how much representation stay-at-home fathers get in media. Instead, my research led me into the stigmas of being a stay-at-home dad. 

Apparently, people have not gotten past the idea that men can be full-time caregivers. Lining up playdates with groups of other people gets real awkward. You may have to ask ten people to get three or fewer yes answers. Fellow men doing this struggle have trouble finding each other because they aren't all that common. Having a wife that works a job that constantly travels is one reason that men sometimes do this. They take on caregiving full-time to give their wives the freedom to do their jobs well. The reversal of the 1950s idea that men work and women take on the children is uncommon, making the Johnny Test and Mr. Mom situation slightly weird to some people. The fact of the matter is simply this; you can't always have a nanny. When fathers do find each other doing the Mr. Mom, they all get together and have fun in a group. 

When it does appear in media

We see it in Johnny Test, Mr. Mom, and The Incredibles. Where is it also? Anime. Unfortunately, it is sometimes used for comedic relief more than anything. The media pokes fun at men staying home or calls it babysitting. The masculine standard does not often include housework - even today. Now that I think of it, even putting Mr. Test in an apron served as comic relief. All he did was yell, stress, clean the floor, tell the girls not to burn the house down, and make bad meatloaf and/or dinner. He was not portrayed as manly and let his kids walk all over him. Mr. Incredible is different, obviously, because of the superhero he is. Mr. Mom was a comedy movie in the first place, yet it didn't treat the dad like he was any less of a man. Representation is all over the place in interpretation. The Shining features a stay-at-home dad, but given the plot, I'd say that wasn't a great example to follow.

Courtesy of Toonzone
Full House was a situation of a widower. This is not what I'm talking about. I am talking about the choice (without the death of a loved one) to stay home to care for the kids so your spouse can work with flexibility. This can also be the choice to work remotely to stay-at-home parent. Being widowed changes every aspect of your life and the living spouse often has to work to make ends meet, making them unlikely stay-at-homes unless they work remotely.

Film and TV

Aside from cartoons, we have other representations in media. The fact is that this is not common in most cartoons and is more common in other media forms, negative and positive impressions. Here are a few examples of good portrayals in film and TV shows. 

In Army Wives we see one character, Roland Burton, care for his kids while his wife goes into the military. This is not bungled to make him look bad. Instead, they show him being a great father with a strong marriage. 

Again, Mr. Mom is a film that truly shows how hard it is to parent full time. Because the main character Jack has been laid off, his wife ends up working long hours away from home advertising tuna. This is one movie that shows men can be great caregivers full time, even if it wasn't going to be a forever position (because he gets his job back). 


Conclusion



The problem here is that most cases in media are single parents or widowers, which doesn't fit the standard I put for Stay-at-home for this blog. Full House and several others are cases of a spouse dying, leaving no other choice. The 1950s standard of women caring for the kids while men work has not left the building. Sometimes unemployment leaves men at home with kids or they work remotely from home. It's all wrapped up in gender policing and masculinity. While some men do choose to actively care for their kids full time, it isn't supported by others around them all the time. Representation needs to change for the better so men who choose to do so can stay home with their kids. We need to break that 1950s standard to make it acceptable for male child care. 

Courtesy of insider.com
Let's break out of the 1950s - for the sake of men and women!











https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/06/17/619557786/stay-at-home-dads-still-struggle-with-diapers-drool-stigma-and-isolation

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2014/06/05/growing-number-of-dads-home-with-the-kids/

https://johnnytest.fandom.com/wiki/Hugh_Test#:~:text=Hugh%20Test%20is%20the%20uptight,a%20character%20in%20Johnny%20Test.

https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/176187/the-rarity-of-the-stay-at-home-father-in-media

4 Films and TV Shows That Portray Fatherhood In A Positive Light - HelloFlo

Our Favorite Stay-at-Home Dads in Movies (tvovermind.com)

Stay at Home Dads | Psychology Today


Monday, August 8, 2022

Cartoon Fan Theories


Many fan theories are out there, some of them ludicrously dark and silly and others that make some sense. Today I'm finding a handful or two that don't get much press coverage. I'm avoiding common ones. 

Courtesy of Reelgood.com


Fan theory is just that - theory. It may not be true and writers have debunked some fan theories outright. I found fan theories for shows that some may know or may not know well. I have Dexter's Laboratory, Scooby Doo, Johnny Test, and Garfield. If you don't want your childhood left in ruins you can skip this post if you like. Now that I've warned you about that, we'll start with Scooby Doo.


Scooby Doo

Courtesy of Pinterest

I am avoiding any of the drug-referenced ones because they are so obvious, which include; 
- every episode = bad drug trip     
- addiction to scooby snacks that are drugged   
- Shaggy = pothead

Look at my sources for more details on those fan theories. I am highlighting the ones you don't hear too much about. 


Scooby Gang = Ghosts

Did you ever consider the gang was driving around in purgatory? Neither did I. All the abandoned places and so few people, as well as the fact they never change clothes point to this theory. They allegedly died in a car crash in the van. 

Here is where we all won't sleep at night. I'm so sorry. Skip down if you want to. 

Courtesy of Reddit

Scooby is suggested to be a spirit guide and the only one without sin, thus the only one who can fight off monsters that are actually demons. This theory suggests Shaggy is a drug addict (we all knew that), Fred and Daphne had sex outside of marriage, and Velma might be a lesbian. The idea is that they are all in limbo. You'll never watch Scooby Doo the same way again. I'm so sorry. 

There is a darker version to this one suggesting they are paying for their sins and Scooby is the demon watching over them, and that if they wander too far from the van Scooby unleashes wrath. I choose not to elaborate on that one. You can find that one online with all the rest of these weird theories, so you can look into it if you choose to. 

Economic Trouble In Coolsville

Why everything seems to be run down in the world of Scooby Doo is simple; a horrible economic collapse has left everywhere in tatters. Some suggest the post-depression era is the explanation. So many abandoned places are scattered everywhere and so few people that it actually makes some sense. Why else would so many buildings be left unused and abandoned?

Courtesy of Dread Central

Another layer to this suggests that the villains are always respectable professionals that could have been laid off or let go. They all want money because the world is not hiring even the most hireable. On top of that depressing fact, Shaggy and Scooby generally get excited over every meal and share it, which means they may not be eating as well when they don't come upon one. Shag and Scoob could be starving, ladies and gents, and that makes me genuinely upset. Shaggy is indeed a skinny dude. That could explain why. 



Dodging The Vietnam Draft Board

All the gang come from different social standings and never have a specific direction they are going. They live in the van. They don't stay in one place for too long. Why? Draft Dodging! The time period suggests they didn't want to be drafted for Vietnam. Shaggy was a hippy who may not have believed in war. Fred didn't want to fight and Daphne came with him so they could potentially start a new life elsewhere. Velma may also disagree with the war. 

Do you notice that they never call the police? Yeah, me neither. But it is true. Fred and Shaggy don't want to be shipped off to combat, so why would they want to? Solving the problem themselves is so much simpler when you are dodging draft boards. Maybe their numbers came up and they needed to run from it. 

Courtesy of Mashable

Scooby Knows They Are Being Hunted

What? Scooby is playing dumb? Yep, apparently, he might be. As a dog, I'd bet he could easily discern a human in a costume and a monster with one sniff. Playing dumb makes him less of a threat and better able to fight off those criminals. He's there to protect the gang. He knows they are being targeted by criminals (which explains how many mysteries they find during their travels). He simply doesn't want to tell them what is truly happening. Making himself less of a target by acting scared will enable him to foil the criminals' plans. 

Fred and Shaggy Dating?

There goes your childhood. Yes, some fans think this is true. The slim evidence on this one is that Fred goes home with Shaggy on a Valentine's day episode. He also states that his name is Fred, unless they are dating. Then it is Freddie. Shaggy calls Fred "Freddie" in a later episode. 

Courtesy of Tumblr

The only problem I have with this one is that Daphne calls Fred "Freddie". I'm not sure about this one. It doesn't have as much backing as the other ones I included. The only way this would work is if Daphne were a front. 



Dexter's Laboratory and Johnny Test

Dexter's Laboratory was odd in a Johnny Test sort of way and connects to Johnny Test. I have five theories to go with this one. I could have found more, but the theories for these two get strange quick and don't always add up. 

Dukey Doesn't Belong To Johnny

Courtesy of Youtube


Allegedly Dukey belongs to Gil, but Johnny had a better bond with the dog. It also explains why Gil and Johnny casually know each other, waving as they pass by. They might be better friends than we think because of Dukey. This one is shockingly simple. 


Johnny Test = Prequel Story to Dexter's Laboratory

Johnny's Mom Courtesy of 
hero.wikia.com





This one is a stretch. The mother in Dexter's Laboratory bears a slight resemblance to the mother in Johnny Test, which means it might be one of the Test sisters that had Dexter. Dexter also manages to enable a dog to talk, which is a duplicate experiment of Dukey's speech abilities. It may also explain how Dexter gets all that equipment and is allowed to do what he does. This one is disputed because the mother "doesn't know" about the lab (though I think she does if this theory actually fits the show). It may also be a sequel and Dexter's son may be Johnny. This one is hazy at best. 

Dexter's Mom courtesy of 
dexterslab.wikia.com


Dexter Killed His Family and Recreated Them

I know but bear with me here. The theme includes the words "There's gloom and doom when things go boom". The idea here is that he accidentally killed his family in an explosion and recreated them out of guilt. The line before that gloom and doom line is this: "But Dee Dee blows his experiments to smithereens". Dee Dee messed with something and he blames himself for the whole situation.

Support you say? Let's look at his together. His family isn't the sharpest of knives in the drawer. Given he recreated them they may be that way because they are not actually themselves anymore. He may have made Dee Dee especially dull because her curiosity killed everyone else and herself before. Dexter also decided that she would need to keep her mouth shut, so he made her loyal. He also beefed them up and made them stronger, thus anything going wrong would likely be fixable. He's convinced he's superior to his rival, too, and that may actually be true if he recreated his entire family again. He has cloned people and knows how to handle the nervous system. He can also control aging in clones. When his mother got sick he was terribly confused - as if he'd made a mistake in her wiring. It makes some sense. 


Johnny Test is Johnny Bravo's Illegitimate Son

Again, these really reach and may not even fit the storyline. Johnny Test has next to nothing in common with his sisters and acts like arrogant Johnny Bravo. Plus, his overworked mother and stressed father have little time for romance. Was there an affair somewhere? Johnny Bravo is blonde, after all. The other option is that the sisters stole a piece of Johnny Bravo's hair and cloned Johnny, thus Johnny 
Test could be a test clone of Johnny Bravo. 

Johnny Bravo can also do a whipcrack sound and Johnny Test does it as well (though in a less controlled way). 

Johnny's Father Hallucinates Everything

I can't find much on this one, but I suppose it could make sense. Johnny Test's father could have been living alone and divorced, losing the kids and Dukey in the process. He's always yelling because he's always angry about the situation. He could have realized he was doing everything in the home, pulled a lawsuit, and lost. The idea that the neighbors don't really interfere fits in with this. They are trying to let him work all this out himself, but they do know he's off his rocker. It explains why the neighborhood doesn't question much. 

The Garfield Theory

This one is downright awful and depressing. Garfield in 6 comic strips wakes up to an abandoned house, wills the happy home back and continues on. What if Garfield was starving alone in a house? Yes, I know, let out all those cries of horror. This is the worst theory I've ever found. Worse than the purgatory Scooby Doo theory. It explains itself. It explains why he's obsessed with food. 

Courtesy of TV Tropes and Jim Davis
 
He's either dead or insane is what it comes down to. Also, Jim Davis denies this one. This is not a confirmed theory by any stretch, and thank God that it isn't! We can all breathe again, ladies and gents. Garfield is not abandoned, nor is he starving. He is loved and fed by John and accompanied by Odie. He is okay. 



Sources:

 https://diply.com/c/118381/cartoon-conspiracy-fan-theories

https://aminoapps.com/c/cartoon/page/blog/the-johnny-test-theory/42MC_YuJn1mR7vLKrPR44nzk03XY1Mm

https://www.businessinsider.com/these-sinister-theories-will-change-how-you-feel-about-childhood-cartoons-2012-5

15 Super Dark Fan Theories About Scooby Doo (ranker.com)

Johnny Test is Johnny Bravo's illegitimate son. : FanTheories (reddit.com)

[Johnny Test/Dexter's Lab] Johnny Test is a prequel to Dexter's Lab : FanTheories (reddit.com)

The Awful Truth about Dexter's Lab : FanTheories (reddit.com)

Insane Fan Theories About Saturday Morning Cartoons | Fanfare (medium.com)




Monday, August 1, 2022

Women Distrusting Women - Why It Happens

 Why do women distrust women? Why do we feel the need to spend time with men and their straightforward communication instead? Let's dive into that deep topic and look at the research. 


Courtesy of bullyingfake.blogspot.com


I need to give you background on my own experiences before we go on. I was bullied in first grade by a girl who ended up bullying our entire classroom. I'm pretty sure this girl would have bullied me earlier if the kindergarten teacher hadn't been so wonderfully vigilant. I don't remember some of my first grade year. My brain blocked it out. When I took a gender class at Malone University I got some of those memories to trigger on accident. One of those memories was this specific girl telling me I wasn't a girl. 

Fast forward through elementary school and into junior high years and I trusted practically no one, after I had been talked about behind my back. By high school, I could ignore rumors like it was an art form. Frankly, I no longer cared what anyone thought of me. This shocked some people. I'm sad to say that women seemed to be participating in more of the gossip than men, at least in my perceptions. 

Something you'll notice about me is that I have more male friends than female friends. Why? Because women have stabbed me in the back far more than men have (although I will say men can be just as destructive). It has taken into adulthood to trust other women again. If you know or were a part of any situation I have discussed above, I am not here to bash you. I hope you have grown into a beautiful human being and have a wonderful day. I am here to talk about my research into why women distrust women. In that same gender class at Malone, I found out that I am not the only one to feel this way. Let's look at what I found. 

The Research

Gender Policing

First, we need to talk about a concept called "gender policing" and no, I'm not talking about women's struggle to become police officers, though that does happen. Social groups have spoken and unspoken social rules, which include how women should and shouldn't behave. Women will ridicule those that don't fit (which I have seen with my own eyes when another classmate got invited to a party and got left in a closet crying). The classmate I just referenced also got pushed to the social fringes like a social deviant. A social deviant is someone who doesn't fit. This girl didn't fit in. I didn't fit in among other women either, but I've commonly been stuck between the social fringes and being well-liked. Put plainly, those that don't behave like the rest of the group and obey social rules will be left out of the group, and even treated badly in some cases. This is gender policing in a nutshell. Men also deal with this crapola. It just looks more aggressive in men. Many insults have to do with someone being too feminine or too masculine (usually being too masculine in the case of females). We are taught from the beginning that it is important we are liked. 

Courtesy of makeameme.org
Gender policing also pressures us into specific behaviors, such as caring more about appearances and not talking about some topics out loud. We learn how to behave from our peers and their reactions, as well as family experiences. I have always been a tomboy. I learned to care more about my appearance because of the influences around me. I am aware that when a woman doesn't dress like the rest of the group wants her to that they will try to pressure her into doing so. Many times I have felt like I was looking through a glass window at the women around me as they didn't include me. It took me until college to truly find my small tribe of female friends that will actively include me in their lives. I did find female friends here and there in my early years, but I can't say that I found a full tribe of them until my twenties. I believe that this had something to do with gender policing, which is a subconscious process oftentimes. Popularity is a major thing from the ages of elementary school to somewhat into college (though I'll say it didn't quite make as much difference in friendships by then). Not shockingly, popular people do more of the gender policing or get shielded from it because of their high social status.

Why Women Get Nasty

Some of the reason women can get nasty includes projecting their own insecurities on others. You have something they want and they can't compete? That's a reason to go after you. They are trying to tear you down to raise themselves higher. In some cases, however, it is because they can get away with it or they seriously lack social skills. Control and power still top the list of reasons why. 

Jealousy is more than enough reason to go after another woman. It is possible that many of us women have done it to each other more often than we think. It is true that we compete for male attention. In connection to being taught to be well-liked, this means that aggression is more under the table than to your face. Women everywhere can write names on the knives sticking out of their backs. If I am perceived as a threat I can be targeted by a female bully. It is all about the competition (for men or anything else). Specific women at workplaces have made people quit or get investigated by others while throwing their knives incognito. I experienced this at one point at my evening job and was lucky enough to have a boss that cared and believed that I did my job. 


This quote from the Huffpost says some of it plain as day. 

"Now fathom this: In a culture where patriarchy is still alive, endearingly belting out delusions of grandeur, thrusting a withered cane into the air from its convalescent bed, dinging the bell for the nurse, at least one crippled mythology has remained -- the story that women are not fully worthwhile unless they are amazing at everything AND beautiful in the eyes of others. For some, external beauty in the eyes of others and oneself is success in and of itself."

According to this quote we still all want to be the fairest of them all, unless of course we no longer care what society says and choose to ignore its ideals. I'm pretty sure that as an introverted hermit crab I go in the latter category, but I can't say that I don't care how I look. This quote explains why the beauty section of any store is so large. I'm sad to say it isn't wrong. Fear leads a few of us to attack others to get what they have. Another quote from Huffpost says it comically well. 


Courtesy of memecentral.org
"So when an attractive woman strolls around your workplace, if she is prettier in your eyes than you are -- or in someone else's eyes -- she might inspire your jealousy. And if you're that kind of woman, even if only for the day, you might treat her differently. She might as well be parading a better resume in front of you. Look at me, I can get a better man, a better job, a better wardrobe... a better life. In a world of squirrels, she might as well have been the squirrel who collected more nuts than you. You might even try to steal her nuts. Or tell the other squirrels how she came about those nuts in a suspicious way. Either way, this squirrel is perceived to have more resources than you, even if some of those nuts are spoiled. Then again, how would you know what kind of nuts she has? All you can see is her pile of nuts. And that's all that matters. Perhaps you should take notes from this fabulous squirrel, maybe even do laps around the tree to get that squirrel's thighs. Perhaps you should kill the fabulous squirrel. You just don't know what to do! Now imagine that you are the beautiful squirrel with the pile of nuts. Now you're getting a little anxious. Now you feel like you should give some away to diminish the danger or perhaps alternatively guard your nuts more fiercely. You just don't know what to do! But why should you give away your nuts? They didn't climb that tree to yank them from the branches. Perhaps they don't have your scampering ability. Perhaps the tree liked you better. Either way, they're your damn nuts, you shouldn't have to make excuses."

If you didn't quite get it or that quote is far too long to take in, it boils down to jealousy. 

Who Gets To Wear The Target

Ladies (and possibly gentlemen) reading this have already put together that the one with the biggest pile of acorns is usually the one getting attacked. It's like the mean girls edition of hunger games. I'm sure some people would pay to see that mash-up of films, but I would not. I have had enough drama in my life without the threat of death attached to it. 

Courtesy of hookedontinerwebs.tumblr.com
According to the list I found online from Pairedlife.com, having the most acorns can include the following:

1. Beauty    2. Brains   3. Strong work ethic                        4. social deviant   5. confidence   6. fashion sense  
7. thin body    8. strong personality   9. competitive nature  10. wealth and money

The more you have, the more targets you have on your back. If you have any of these, you have at least one. Beauty, in this case, doesn't have to be perceived by you. Should anyone see you as competition because you are pretty they might let their claws come out, even if you have no idea why those claws came out. 



How To Deal With The Claws


Is it your fault their claws came out and you didn't see it coming? No, not unless you attacked them first. Assuming those verbal claws came out of left field and you didn't stab them earlier, compliments go a long way. Being nice goes a long way.  Respect is key. When being nice doesn't make a difference, go somewhere else and avoid those knives by distancing yourself. 

Another aspect of insecurities includes your mind. Maybe keep it light on the conversational side of things until you know who you are talking to. Like minds will not fear you. Try not to be a know-it-all or boast about things and you'll be fine. Again, distance yourself if those claws don't retract. 

Courtesy of kwize.com


Gossip is something you want to steer clear of. If they talk badly about everyone else, you're next. It is safer to keep a stiff arm between you and someone who is a malicious gossip. When the gossip disappears around you, you'll know that you stepped out of a friendship circle that was toxic. 



Long story short, be respectful and kind. Flee when you find out that the knives will not stop coming. Find your tribe. Don't try to fit in where you are clearly not wanted or you'll be abused. That's called simping. It doesn't end well. 

Try not to let these women rattle you (especially dealing with adults). Don't let them see it, at the very least. Understand you can't control their behavior, but you can control yours. It is an option to walk away (as long as you don't have to work with them in the same room). As hard as this is, stand up for yourself and set those clear boundaries. Keep working. Disengage from the conversation. Workplace aggression should be reported. In the meantime, manage your stress in whatever way works for you (journaling, counseling, breathing calmly...). 

Why Women Bullying Is Different Than Men Bullying


Women bully psychologically. They go after what you have and tear you down in order to gain power over you, and sometimes control you after the fact. This is relational bullying. Cyberbullying, gossip, harassment, intimidation, ostracization, and verbal insults all come with this territory. The sad thing about women bullies is that other women may join in as a means of self-preservation in an effort to avoid the same attack. Be aware that standing up for others opens you up to these same attacks (something I learned many times over). All those nasty comments and false rumors can be unleashed on you in return. Your secrets can also be released to the entire classroom. 

In first grade I couldn't possibly communicate that I was being bullied. I learned later on about the whole classroom being bullied. I wasn't alone, but I sure thought I was. Stand up for others, blog readers. Don't stand by and let it all happen in front of you. Go get help if you don't know what to do. Report it, anonymously or not. Don't let anyone get away with tearing down and ripping apart the self-esteem of another human being. 

Most scenarios include deep insecurities, which are then suppressed by making another person miserable and worse off than the bully. Weak people and competition are the first targets. The social drama begins here. Screaming and emotional scenes, threats, making a job harder to do, creating a clique that follows only the bully's rules, and so forth may happen. Workplaces that have limited opportunities breed this because every woman is competition. Other women become collateral damage.
It requires talking to management to deal with all that. 

If you need another example take a look at the book/movie "The Help". It involves both race and female bullying as these women try to make a living in the south. The key word here is status. In most cases the bully is trying to pull herself up the ladder with no heed to who she shoves off of it. You'll notice that many movies end in the bully losing the game. This is because a lot of people have been bullied and want justice.

A Word For Parents With Daughters

Don't overreact to this situation. I know, in my mother's case, that she tried to talk to the teacher when she noticed I no longer liked school in first grade. The teacher that year was so distracted by personal problems that she didn't even see any of it happen and didn't listen to me try to tell her. Overreacting might make it worse in some cases. Be there. Just be there. Listen if they are old enough to talk to you about it. If they speak of the situation try to help them problem solve solutions. Ask questions. 

Courtesy of Pinterest
Angry? Yes, you should be. Girls are brutal. It took years (tail end of college) to trust women ever again. Some of them never grow up and keep doing this to their "friends". Believe me, you can be angry. Most of all, let your child release their emotions to you. Help them let it out. Be a sounding board. Deal with your own anger, while you are at it. Do what you need to in order to release it. 

Encourage them to find new friends and get to know more people around them. This includes teachers like my mother who will let them sit in her classroom and avoid the bullies. Encourage social life outside of the school (especially if the mob mentality has begun and she's being shunned). Give her outlets to make her social circle bigger and grow her confidence. Let her figure this out in her time, as frustrating as it is, to make sure she learns who is a friend and who isn't (with your guidance, of course).

Let the school know immediately if a property has been destroyed, there is a threat of harm, or a physical assault happens. Contact the school and law enforcement at that point. You have no choice. Be clear and specific when you describe the incident. No matter what, tell the school what is going on. Teachers can be on alert for the situation from there. Tell your daughter you are talking to the school before you do it. If she says she can handle it, let her. Should she need help and not want it known, do it discreetly. 

What schools can do is talk to specific classrooms, which will spotlight those that thought they could fly under the radar (rumor mongers hate this). If a bully is protected by someone, go higher up the food chain. Principals and school boards are good places to go if that is the case. Status may protect some community members. Wising up the head of organization by saying something may reveal more bullying in the administration.

This was a heavy topic. Here, have Mean Girls quote that had me laughing hysterically. 

Courtesy of me.me





Sources:

https://revelpreview.pearson.com/epubs/pearson_kimmel_soc/OPS/xhtml/ch09_pg0013.xhtml
https://www.ywcawcmi.org/our-services/prevention-and-empowerment/prevention/socialnorms/gender-policing/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/working-btches/201308/why-are-some-women-nasty-other-women#:~:text=Essentially%2C%20there%20are%20three%20main,of%20self%2Desteem%20and%20confidence.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-women-are-meaner-to-each-other-than-men-are-to-women-2018-03-05
https://www.drnancyoreilly.com/why-are-women-so-mean-to-other-women/
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jealousy_b_1914374
https://pairedlife.com/etiquette/Top-Ten-Things-That-Make-a-Women-Threatening-to-Other-Women
https://www.verywellfamily.com/how-to-confront-adult-mean-girls-460676
https://www.empoweringparents.com/article/girl-bullying/
https://www.publicpeople.org/what-is-female-bullying.htm
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-long-reach-childhood/201109/bullying-in-the-female-world

Monday, July 25, 2022

The balanced game challenge

Video games that have overpowered weapons, puzzles that are too hard, no challenge level, or cause a specific race or player type to die or win too often are unbalanced. This makes gameplay frustrating. Today I'm taking a look at how this can be avoided by game designers. 

Courtesy of Game Skinny


Video game design starts with a core mechanic and then gets balanced out. An unbalanced game is not an enjoyable experience. Two-player games are balanced when no one has an unfair advantage. Single-player games deal with whether the challenge is correct for the audience. The best games have challenge and balance. The best game designers know who they are aiming at, whether they are aiming at the competitive gamers or the average population. 

Single Player

When games get harder as you play that is because they know your skills rise as you play the game. They need the pacing to match your challenge level. When the challenge level matches the age range you are aiming for they call that balanced. This is why games take time to come out after they have been playtested. If only a few testers are available they aim for the middle ground.

Making a game too hard or too easy is always an issue. You have to know your audience's age and gaming level. You can even add a level choice like Herinteractive does. Portal, for example, comes with no instructions other than the pictures and the robotic voice that awakens you. This is aimed at adults. Nancy Drew games sometimes have Nancy herself state the obvious or what you need to do next as if she is talking to herself, thus we can assume the game is aimed at younger players or accommodates for the younger players.

Courtesy of Herinteractive
In this case, it has to do with a balance of choices. Objects should all have uses. If one thing you read about in the game never happens it doesn't need to be in the game at all. Situational knowledge without the situation is useless. Basically, the ability to choose what tools to use should end in using them at least once in one or two situations. Other than that, balance is less of an issue in single-player games. 

In mystery games what I find is that the balance of puzzles and dialogue is often discussed among us players. At the end of the day, however, we all like different puzzles, different plot depth, and different amounts of necessary dialogue. It is hard to please everyone. You can't. 

Asymmetric Games

When a game has multiple starting and ending points you have an asymmetric game. This means resources and starting points are not going to be entirely equal. Games where one player begins are asymmetrical. Some games unbalance it on purpose, but if you don't intend to do that it is best to balance an asymmetric game. Symmetric games are when players begin on even ground. 

Courtesy of Rumble Games

Playtesting is harder to do in this category, but what can be done is making sure resources can be shared amongst players or that two resources are worth the same thing. This can't always be done. Sometimes different rules apply to different groups. There are different and conflicting goals, as well, so extensive playtesting is needed on these games. It can't be impossible for one side and easy for the other. 
Strategy also has a place here. One strategy can be better or worse than another. Balance is having different strategies that are powerful and leaving the strategies ignored by playtesters out. Trading card games need a balanced system, where something can be countered. The same goes for weaponry and money-making in games. When all this is balanced out battles are more fun to play and farms are more fun to make a profit from.  

The two basic goals related to game objects boil down to not making the object too weak and not making it too powerful. Adding drawbacks to a certain object or benefits to that same object is one way this is achieved. There has to be some challenge or players will get bored. On the other hand, it can't be too hard to play and end in rage-quitting. When given the choice of making a weapon too powerful or too weak the game developers may choose weakness so a player can't dominate everyone else. Through math and formulas game creators work out if the cost is equaled out. Excel sheets are good ways to do this. 

Rock-paper-scissors is a good way to explain how some games balance out. Element A beats Element B, Element C beats Element A, and Element B beats Element C. When a player chooses to be an archer, for example, they get benefits that a foot soldier doesn't get. When I choose a river farm in Stardew Valley I lose land to plant crops and gain a fishing spot. My husband chose a forest farm, so he gains more hardwood in the long run. They are different and have different advantages. To make a long story short, your choices have a counter to them. In battles this is vital. Stardew is not a battle situation, but it does affect your farming focus all the same. 

Why Games Get Updates

Speaking of Stardew Valley, developers can tweak games after release. "Nerfing" or lowering the power of a weapon is one thing a designer may do, as well as adding elements and taking out objects that no one seems to even use. Stardew Valley has had many updates and fixed many bugs that players used to exploit. Not that it stops people from breaking into game code or modding the game (it hasn't), but it does reflect that game designers pay attention to mods that come out and videos that show you how to exploit bugs in the game. Multiple players post these online. Developers are watching for this.

When players say something is OP (Overpowered) they do care. If one type of player is constantly winning or constantly losing it is a major problem that needs to be addressed. Also, if no one is using a specific object at all for a long period of time it may be unnecessary. Unnecessary game objects disappear and OP objects get downsides added. OP strategies may also get the same treatment as the OP objects connected to them. 

Courtesy of Twinfinite
Adding objects, maps, or characters can also happen in updates. Stardew used to only have the standard farm and now we have many farms to choose from. Many mods were added to the original game after they became popular. Looking at the list of mods online will tell you that directly. Videogame designers do care about what we like and think, so don't be afraid to give review feedback on what you'd like to see. 





https://learn.canvas.net/courses/3/pages/level-12-dot-0-game-balance

https://www.gamedesigning.org/learn/balance/

https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6400/understanding_balance_in_video_.php?print=1

https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/game-design-deep-dive-crafting-mystery-through-gameplay-in-i-nauticrawl-i-

Single Player Game Balance – Celia Alexis Wagar's CritPoints

Monday, July 18, 2022

Mermaids and Sea Monsters

 What did sailors and pirates truly see when they told tales of sea monsters and mermaids? Were they manatees or dolphins? Are there sea dinosaurs that survived the flood? Let's dive into that. 

Courtesy of storytrender.com 
This is a fake mermaid.

Today we discuss what the sailors actually witnessed when they claimed to see mermaids, as well as what sea monsters could be or truly are. I'm going to go into the mythology first (in both categories) and then research what they could be. Ready to set sail? I know I am. 

Mythology and Mermaids

Myths tell tales of sirens and giant sea monsters. Both are bad news. You have the possibility of either shipwrecking, drowning, or being eaten. Sirens are shown holding human skulls. They didn't pull those out of the sea at random. I'll let you put the pieces together on that one. While that was not every mermaid you found, you'd better keep wax to put in your ears anyway- just in case! Many gods and goddesses also had a tailed form and could be found at sea. 

Courtesy of freedivinguae.com
A Dungong - a sea cow
Merpeople are indeed both genders and both dangerous and friendly. Sirens are the dangerous variety. By singing alone a siren can control sailors, causing them to crash ships into rocks. Some had wings and were cursed to be demons because they failed to prevent Persephone's abduction. After the crash, they would allegedly eat the sailors, which is where that human skull came from. Sightings of these creatures are indeed attributed to manatees (sea cows, essentially) who could look similar to fat merpeople if you didn't see enough of their face. Dolphins or Dungong are also possibilities.

Persian and Irish myths paint mermaids in a new light, claiming they can use legs or fins and be on both land (for a short time) and the sea. This is more like Ariel. They are shy, mystical, and good. They are curious about life on land. In this case, whether they are good or bad depends on your culture. Lots of tragic storms fed the evil interpretation of mermaids. It is likely that mermaids had nothing to do with many sailors' deaths; it is far more likely that bad weather conditions doomed the sailors to shipwreck and the sharks got a good meal. 

Mythology and Sea Monsters

There are many monsters in mythology, countless in fact. They are almost always bad news. Mermaids varied, but not sea monsters. Do you want to hear about the world's largest mythical sea horse? His name is Jormungand. He's known for being wrapped around the world and holding his tail in his mouth. Ragnorak (apocalypse) will begin if he lets go of his tail, according to legend. He's Loki's child. Cthulu is another big name and he's from space. There is a writer who loves to talk about him. He's a humanoid squid with dragon wings. The Kraken is well known by anyone who's paid attention in literature classes and terrorizes sailors. It was probably just a giant squid in real life. A dogfish is referenced in Pinnochio. A sea bishop was found and given to a king, asked to be let go, made the sign of the cross, and went on its way. This is the only exception. Need I go on listing famous and known sea legends? I think you get my point. It's shockingly common. Maps with sea monsters on them marked unknown territory or dangerous seas. 

Courtesy of Band Camp
Kraken
Did I miss Leviathan? No, I just don't count biblical references as mythological. Besides, Leviathan sounds more like a poetic metaphor for end times than anything else. Only God knows if that is a real monster or not and I don't know if I want to know. It's not like Nessy or other references that have sightings. 

Back to the rest of the references, we find they are all from different cultures. One might just be fictional literature. At this point, I am convinced that bad weather is also to blame for this category of monster. Mythology often tried to explain the unexplained. Horrible waves and bad storms factor into that perfectly. Sirens and Sea Monsters are often put in the same category. There are also weird fish that are huge. Big squids, misidentified whales, misidentified sharks, and dinosaurs that could have survived the flood may be a believable explanation for the sightings that have come up. 

What Are They Really?

Mermaids

Much like Bigfoot, there are "sightings" and people who chase this legend around. The world is not Gravity Falls, yet conspiracy theory abounds (and I'm guilty of finding it fascinating, whether it is real or fake). In the case of mermaids, the answer is no. You won't find merpeople in your lake anytime soon. Like I said before, manatees and other creatures are mistaken for merpeople quite often. Weirdly, there are still reported sightings. PT Barnum faked one by putting a monkey body on a fish tale, and then made people pay to see it. It was faked quite often, even at the World's Fair. Women swam in a fish tank and people paid to watch the performance (probably knowing it was fake).

Sightings? Yes, I said sightings. In AD 77 scaled bodies were found washed up on beaches. The Romans found them. Later evidence suggested they were seals. Christopher Columbus claimed to see masculine-featured mermaids. The area he was in was common to manatees and scientists think he saw those. Henry Hudson thought he saw one in the arctic ocean. A book about his adventures (written by his uncle) was thought to have been embellished to include that. In other words, it was a tall tale. Blackbeard saw one, too, and he was known for bending the truth to control his crew. He used the excuse to go to the Indies and steer his crew away from an area. In 1730 China had two encounters - one with fine multicolored hair and the other with webbed feet and hands. Both were rescued and went back to the sea (one left after her rescuer had died). It was thought that it was an encounter with a sea mammal of some sort. 

Do you want more modern sightings? Okay, I'll tell you about those. 1880s Canada held a tale of three men and a native guide. The tourists thought they saw a dark-skinned woman with blonde hair rise out of the water and stare at them. The guide quit soon after because mermaids were bad luck and led to death. Pennsylvania in 1881 tells a tale of a man who saw a black-haired mermaid in the Susquehanna River tributary (Dugan's Run). She's allegedly there in the early morning or late evening and only goes up to her shoulders in the water. Henry Loucks, who found her, was trying to lure her out of her cave home. Loucks almost shot her, then considered that he didn't want to be tried for murder. The Kei Islands tale wasn't truly investigated, so this one is a mystery still. In 1943 Japanese soldiers reported mermaids, then one decided to make threatening (gurgling and burping) noises at them. Naturally, instead of leaving it alone, the village was ordered to kill the one that "attacked" them. The creature had spikes on its head, a human face and limbs, and a fish-like mouth. It was delivered to the Japanese soldiers dead. Again, not been investigated, so we don't know. Victoria, Canada in 1967 tells a tale of a blonde, oblivious mermaid with a porpoise tale eating raw salmon by a tour boat. Pictures of the incident could not be traced. No one, even at the price of 25,000 dollars, could capture her. In Hawaii, 1998, divers reported a naked woman with a fish tale swimming with dolphins. The one diver saw it again and claims to have photographic proof. 

The mermaid sighting in Hawaii 1998
Courtesy of Jeff Leicher - found on pinterest



Want more modern? Let's talk about 2009 Israel. There was a young mermaid reported in Haifa Bay by many people. No one has yet claimed the one million dollar reward for proving her existence. Zimbabwe in 2012 was a case where workers installing water pumps claimed to be chased off by mermaids. An exorcist came in to help, yet they couldn't resume work. Dams are unfinished to this day because they feared the mermaids would capture and drag them off. The workers refused to go back to work. 

Sea Monsters

Sea monsters, much like mermaids, have sightings reported. Also, they might be dinosaurs. When earth flooded in the great flood I'd bet some lived (including sharks). Sharks are dinosaurs. Loch Ness is home to Nessy, allegedly, and she might be one (if she's real). Again, though, we do have to understand that God put so many fish in the sea that we haven't found them all. We never will, given the water pressure. Misidentifying unknown animals is the most logical explanation for sea monsters. Whales, sharks, and other huge fish tend to be a bit intimidating and sailors are kind of in their way, thus it makes sense they'd be less than happy. We're also small in comparison and we're scared. Sailors also might have been drunk at times or telling big fish stories. Dead fish washing up on beaches, unidentified at the time, were considered monsters. 

Courtesy of Youtube
That being said, let's talk sightings. The Kraken was described as a monstrous fish. It looked like a mix of fish and squid. It was a giant squid. One washed up one day and it was identified by science. 150-200 feet is indeed a monstrous size of fish. The Hydra (Hercules killed it) was said to actually be an octopus because it can regrow limbs, as well as tentacles possibly being mistaken for heads. It was hardly as threatening as they thought and we now know what it is. The Oarfish is not a common viewing pleasure, but it does explain the trope about a long sea serpent. It is the longest bony fish currently living, 45-50 feet long, and has spines running up and down its back. It is what we often think of as a sea monster. When washed onto shore it is likely to be seen as one. 

I could go on about misidentified whales and species for a while. That is essentially what has happened. God didn't hand Adam a guidebook to pass on for generations. The extent of the animals on earth is not known. We can't cross off animals on our guidebooks and go "oh, we found the mighty fluferbat and now we can make a new discovery!" Nope, we instead get scared of what washes up on shore, despite the fact it could be harmless and just not be common knowledge. Sea monsters are and aren't real. We can prove that someone found something; we just don't know what they found until we study it. It sometimes turns out to be less than monstrous.

Conclusion


It comes down to the fear of the unknown. Most of us don't know what is in the ocean. The oceans hold freaky creatures that can kill you or be completely harmless. Sailors way back when knew even less. The seas were new to them. Can you blame them for encountering a new animal bigger than them and getting scared for their lives? The sea, like the jungle, can actively try to kill you. 

I'll say this about mermaids, though - why are there sightings in the 2000s? The world may never know. Science can't show us evidence of these merpeople at this time. What I don't understand is why people in 2012 claim to have seen mermaids. It boggles my mind. The science answer for mermaids is no, however, so I'm going to put them in the same category as unicorns and possibly Bigfoot - unproven. I'll let you come to your own conclusions. 


Sources: