Famous Actors with PTSD

 If you were to rewatch any Jimmy Stewart movie you would find the "Hitchcock" look in a lot of them. You would also see what looks like a PTSD episode in several scenes of It's A Wonderful Life. Let's talk about that.

Photo by Talk Film Society

Audi Murphy and Jimmy Stewart both had PTSD. I'd like to honor those veterans by talking about their war experiences. In It's A Wonderful Life the film crew recognized that when Stewart's character broke down it wasn't acting. Look for the scene where George Bailey comes home and screams at the children, then clears a table in one swoop. He then snaps out of it and apologizes after looking at what he'd done. It looks convincingly like real fear in the actors' eyes. Watch the clip below from the time 6:42 to almost the end if you want to see the scene I am referring to. One Facebook post once claimed that was a PTSD episode, but I don't have positive (written) proof of it (and not for lack of searching). All I can say for sure is that it sure looks like one. Another scene to look for is when he is praying at Martini's and breaks down into sobbing. (Those were real tears.)

Audie Murphy never showed this type of emotion on film, as far as I know, but was a terror on the film set. He slept with a loaded gun beside him and David Niven (another actor who worked with him) says that he would wake up and let out a whole round into the air. He is highly decorated and survived battles that he technically shouldn't have. He came back looking a lot better than Jimmy Stewart in the face department, yet he paid a high cost for surviving his missions. 

Jimmy Stewart

I'm starting with Stewart. He was a pilot during World War II and was a commander. His fear was that he would make a mistake and cause someone else to die, which caused confirmed PTSD (flak happy, according to the time period). That is proven. He did, in fact, suffer from PTSD. Whether that was what motivated his performance in It's A Wonderful Life isn't totally proven, but makes complete and total sense. That was the first movie he filmed upon returning from WWII.  He looked like he had aged 10 to 20 years. It was said that he couldn't articulate how the war had changed him, but he could release the emotion of it during an acting performance. Given that, I understand why Hitchcock used him so often.

Photo by Montgomery Advertiser

His final mission was in February 1945. He was grounded for PTSD issues, then returned at the end of August. The only other movie offer he got was a movie about him, including his war service in the main storyline. He refused. He almost refused It's A Wonderful Life. He took it because it was the only offer he had at the time. During the filming he was still having nightmares, getting shaky, and sweating. He had just gotten to the point of holding food down again. Hearing loss had also developed since the war. Part of the reason for the edgy performance was that they were concerned the movie would bomb (it came out even, in the end), and part of Stewart's performance was rage because he battled whether he had an important role in Hollywood anymore. Again, PTSD was still present in him and it came out in those scenes where George Bailey was breaking. Still, I will not tell you that I have positive proof of this. He did in fact get mood swings, which would explain the real fear during the scene clip I included above. He did lash out in rage like that and then pause as if he lost himself for a minute, which leads me to believe that was a real PTSD mood swing captured on film. 

Stewart wrestled with guilt and rage in silence. It came out in the acting roles he chose to take. There was one instance where they bombed the wrong city by mistake and Stewart felt guilt for killing civilians. He once lost 13 planes and 130 men (his friends) died. Shenandoah and Winchester 73 were darker film roles that he wouldn't have been able to do before the war. He now had a dark side to him. Early in the war they used him for PR stunts until he demanded he see real action. He piloted a B-24 (the 445th) and was commander of the 703rd Squadron. The body count rose fast and he had gotten to know his men, so it got to him quick. Every dead man was one job he could have done better. He never talked about any of it until the end of his life. In 1976 her returned to military service in Tibenham, England where he was a squadron commander for four months. He was also a bomber pilot during the Vietnam war. He had nightmares for the rest of his life, if I understand my research correctly. Correct me if I'm wrong. 

'The nightmares come every night. There was on oxygen at 20,000 feet with 190s zipping past, spraying lead and firing rockets, flak bursting about the cockpit. B-24s hit, burning, spinning out of formation.

Bail out! Bail out! Do you see any chutes? How many chutes? Whose ship was it? Oh God, not him?

Not them! Bodies, pieces of bodies smacking off the windshield. And the most frequent dream, an explosion under him and the plane lifted by it and the feeling that this was the end.' 

At the end of his service he was awarded the Air Medal with oak leaf clusters, the Distinguished Flying Crosses, and the Croix de Guerre. He also was sent to a treatment center at some point (the flak farm), according to his men. After the war he sought out roles that let him release his emotion, which again explains choosing films like Vertigo and various other Hitchcock films. 

Audie Murphy

This guy was dangerous to be on set with. While his PTSD didn't show up on film screens, it did scare his coworkers. In comparison to Stewart he looked fabulous and attractive. His PTSD led him to have a loaded gun with him, so I'd imagine his mind wasn't as good-looking as his face. He never truly left the war behind, not mentally. He was one of the first to talk openly about his PTSD. He was considered a hero for his war service. He didn't like being publicized for having medals when he felt that the men who never made it home should have gotten them. He didn't want the attention he got and resisted being called a hero.

Murphy lied about his age to join the Marines but was too small to join. He ended up in the infantry. He was a highly skilled soldier and marksman. By WWII's end, he was the most decorated soldier and had earned 28 medals. Murphy says it made him grow up too fast. He dealt with depression, insomnia, and nightmares. He could only sleep with a loaded gun under his pillow. He became addicted to pills and realized it, so he locked himself into a motel room and went through the withdrawal for a week. He died at age 45 in a plane crash. He wanted a simple burial with no military involved and got a military honored burial, despite what his will said. His stone is plain and inconspicuous, like an ordinary soldier's grave. His birth year is incorrect because of falsified information when he enlisted.

He held off a German attack by himself and led a counterattack while wounded. He'd had his men hide while he did so and then led them out. Read these quotes from History Channel and you can see how bad it was. He'd held off Germans for an hour at the point of going back to his men in the woods.

After emptying his M-1 carbine at the enemy, Murphy grabbed his field telephone and took cover atop the burning tank destroyer. Over the radio, he could hear the artillery commander asking how close the Germans were to his position. “Just hold the phone and I’ll let you talk to one of the bastards!” he yelled back.

Dazed and bloodied, he jumped from the still-burning tank destroyer and limped to his men. He later wrote that as he walked away, one thought in particular kept racing through his mind: “How come I’m not dead?”

Photo by Jeremy Roberts

The truth was that he survived so many battles and injuries that he was forever scarred by his PTSD and the war itself. He had a massively successful Hollywood career. Despite that, he could never relax or feel the peace that the war was over. It never really ended in his brain. He spoke out saying the military should provide better medical care to veterans. During the war he survived at least three wounds, malaria, gangrene, and many dead friends.

Conclusion

These two men came home and couldn't shake the war. As a result, we have movies that have a dark edge to them and many westerns branded with Murphy's face. Murphy nor Stewart wanted to be glorified for their service. Stewart didn't get as much attention for his service as Murphy did due to how Stewart aged during the war. After looking into both these men I respect them even more. 

Well done, First Lieutenant Major Audie Murphy and Major General Jimmy Stewart!

Sources:

https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/movies/ct-jimmy-stewart-book-mov-1202-20161201-column.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3825552/Jimmy-Stewart-suffered-extreme-PTSD-lost-130-men-fighter-pilot-WW-II-acted-anguish-filming-s-Wonderful-Life.html

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/entertainment/its-a-wonderful-jimmy-stewart-world-war-ii-service/index.html

https://www.tpr.org/show/texas-matters/2017-08-23/texas-matters-audie-murphy-war-hero-movie-star-ptsd-sufferer

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/audie-murphy-troubled-american-moh.html

https://jeremylr.medium.com/uncovering-resilient-american-soldier-audie-murphy-dd763ca0e5

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/22570/amazing-life-audie-murphy

https://www.history.com/news/audie-murphys-world-war-ii-heroics-70-years-ago?li_source=LI&li_medium=m2m-rcw-biography

The fashion that harmed humans the most

It is so rewarding to see a small waist, flat stomach, lower numbers on the scales, etc.......but what if trying to conform to the "beauty" trend of the current fashion is harming you? Today we look at what fashion trends hurt both genders the most. 

Photo by Global Founders London

Fashion trends promote different shapes of women every century or so. S-shaped, curvy, flat and boyish, or rail thin have all been trends that have come up in history. The 2010s promoted a big booty. My point? If fashion is going to change its mind every few years we need to stop obeying its rules. We need to stop buying into a harmful image of beauty, in some and many cases. 

Some of it is less harmful after the industry was regulated (like makeup, for instance). Makeup, perfumes, and hair products have now been held to a safety standard. That is because people lost hair, went blind, went insane, and severely damaged themselves with lead paint during the early years of using it. We have learned from our mistakes. Bras have since been invented and we no longer need to worry about corsets (but we will talk about them). 

Corsets and Body Shape

After some research on Corsets, I am glad I was not born into wearing one as a regular undergarment. I see some cosplayers wearing them for one day for the sake of one cosplay and not lacing them tightly in the middle. That is not what I am talking about. What I am speaking of is the constant or daily use of this early shaping device and wearing it too tightly. One day of wearing it is not years of shoving your body into a device that makes you unable to breathe. No, one day cosplaying won't kill you and you shouldn't lace it as tight as the women in the Victorian period. Good cosplayers know how to not suffocate themselves. Get one fit to your measurements, if you are going to use one.

Photo by Corset Deal

Daily use of corsets being worn too tightly displaced organs, broke ribs, caused all kinds of back problems, and created trouble giving birth. Women being seen as frail in some periods of time could possibly link back to the misuse of this daily device. They couldn't even sit in one individual case. The bra was a wonderful invention when it did come, and that was only two handkerchiefs sewn together with a ribbon. Strangely, history tells us men wore them, too, and I'd imagine men during Shakespeare's theatrics probably did themselves no favors. 

That being said, you can safely wear a corset, unlike those that took it to the extreme. It just isn't the only bra and shaping device you have anymore. It was meant to help women wear heavy dresses. You should still have room to breathe. Men had corsets marketed to them, too, for support and looks. We call them vests now and they aren't the same. It was only harmful if you overtighten them for an unhealthy waistline (which is no different than anorexia and bulimia, minus the fabric). For more information and history on this topic, click here for how it works. 

Dieting

Speaking of anorexia and bulimia, dieting is just as dangerous as an overtightened corset. It just doesn't involve fabric. Dieting has two reasons; one is self-image and the other is health. Diets can be safe if done correctly, but if you are attempting a "Twiggy" status (becoming a stick for a trend) I'd advise against it. Don't over-exercise or starve yourself, please. I do care about you (and I may not even know you in person). Strange things are prompted by a warped self-image. Get help if you need it. 

What doesn't help is that we see on media that we need to look like the latest trend. All the newest styles are shown off by celebrities and TV shows, as well as social media advertisements and fashion stores (which don't stock what isn't the fashion). Peer pressure is not the greatest, either, and when we all are being herded by media trends (not kidding) it happens. Influence is everywhere in media. Analyze your media sources and you'll prove it. 

Misc. Trends that ended in death and harm

There are many fashion trends that ended in death, other than diets and extreme corsetry. Glowing hair is one of them. This was achieved by putting radium into your hair with a comb for a few years. Your hair would then glow in the dark after that. Radioactive hair (or nails) is not a healthy trait to have. It killed some women. 

Photo by Nature

This you knew, but footbinding was bending a child's foot in half around the age of 5 and forcing someone to have trouble walking for the rest of their life. The Chinese are famous for this. Tiny feet were perfect in this culture and the trend ended around the 20th century. High heels are nothing compared to this harmful deformity. Can you die of it? Not unless you are unable to run from a fire or household disaster. But still, women couldn't go much farther than their own home with this badly deformed pair of feet.

Neck rings that shove down the shoulder don't extend the neck. Yet, the Kayan people consider it to be the height of beauty. Don't ask me why. They start them off young, too, so that's even worse. Deformed shoulders in the name of fashion are not okay. 

Fun fact, a stiff collar can suffocate you. Men dealt with this and one nearly cut his own head off falling down in the street. I thought I'd be talking about only women today, but I was wrong. Men had some toxic trends, too. Gender does not matter when it comes to toxic fashion.

If diets are bad now, try eating tapeworms to lose weight. I wish I were kidding. Say hello epilepsy and meningitis! This is banned in the United States. I don't think I need to say anything more on the subject.

Ever considered a lead facial for youthful paleness? Queen Elizabeth did. It was not good for your hair and caused baldness for women. The Victorian era was famous for bad fashion ideas and badly made makeup (which is safe now).

an example of nightshade eyes 
Photo by Death/Scent

Nightshade eye drops are dangerous for many reasons - one of them being that you were putting poison berries in your eyes. Another is that you can go blind after two uses of this. It made your eyes dilate and look innocent, allegedly. 

Shaving your legs becomes dangerous when you use lotion made of arsenic to remove hair. Arsenic is poison. Diabetes, cancer, and vascular disease are caused by arsenic. While it melted the hair away, it also took some of your health with it. 

Fire hazards are more common in fashion than you think. Crinolines caused death by fire if you walked too close to a hot surface or fireplace, where you then burst into flames and could die. Some hair decoration could go up in flames in seconds. Fancy ball gowns and fireplaces are not a woman's friend.

Because people loved hats, let's talk about how they were made early on. Mercury was used by hat makers, like the Mad Hatter, and exposure to that substance drives you insane. It explains the eccentric hat makers that came about. Mercury is toxic. The hatters worked in poorly vented rooms. It can kill you or shorten your lifespan. Click here for more details.

Conclusions

I know a lot of fashion trends are dangerous and I want to make sure you understand the psychological motives behind following them. If I put on a corset and looked in the mirror I would be rewarded with a waist that makes me look fantastic. I'd feel beautiful. If I did that one day and had it sized to me that does no harm, but if it is the trend and I engage in extreme corsetry every day of my life I am crossing a line. There is no harm in boosting appearances. There is, however, a fine line that should not be stepped over; that line is when your fashion choices are impacting your health and quality of life. No fashion trend is worth your life. 

If you feel you have to look perfect every day of your life you were told wrong. Don't buy into that. At the end of the day and at the end of my life I am not going to reflect on how perfectly I dressed and did my makeup (and I barely wear it). Impulsively having to look perfect daily is a self-esteem issue and should be faced with help and support. 

Sources:

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20150624-when-fashion-kills

https://www.airyhair.com/blog/5-dangerous-deadliest-fashion-trends-history/amp/

https://gloriousdays.co/is-fashion-responsible-for-body-image-issues/

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190311-how-social-media-affects-body-image

https://nyamcenterforhistory.org/2015/05/29/did-corsets-harm-womens-health/

https://www.orchardcorset.com/pages/corsets-cosplay

https://nerdsonearth.com/2016/02/cosplay-accessories/

https://www.orchardcorset.com/pages/corsets-101#:~:text=Is%20waist%20training%20or%20wearing,waist%20training%20is%20perfectly%20safe.

https://corset-story.co.uk/blogs/news/is-wearing-a-corset-bad-for-you

My Nancy Drew Gaming Strategy

 I don't think I'm surprising anyone by saying I'm part of the Nancy Drew gaming community. Those that know me personally know my love of Nancy Drew continued from when I was ten until present day. I have a strategy for any Nancy Drew games I play. Today I'm going to let you in on that. 

Photo by The Senior Detective Blog

The Herinteractive Nancy Drew games are point-and-click mysteries for the PC, with the exception of maybe a Hardy Boys DS game and few other forms that didn't work out as well. There are a few that are discontinued, in case you were curious, but otherwise, most of them are available on the Herinteractive website, Big Fish Games, and Steam. You can find the discontinued ones on E-bay or Amazon for varied prices. 

The idea of this game series is that you are Nancy Drew and must solve the mystery. She travels everywhere and anywhere asking questions and solving puzzles. Most games have a balance of plot and puzzles. Some are puzzle or question heavy. I've learned that everyone has different priorities when it comes to which ones they love, aren't into, or hate. Try them all (if you can get your hands on the ones that are discontinued, give them a chance, too) and make your own judgments. If you can play it and have fun, I consider it a good game.

Senior mode and Junior mode are barely different in some games and drastically different in others. It depends on the game itself. The older ones tend to be at the same challenge level and just lack hints. Senior has no checklist or a vague checklist in games. Try to finish it quickly at this level or keep a manual task list. Always keep a task list on paper while playing the first and oldest games.

First Steps

Imagine you are playing a new game or a game you haven't played in forever. Given this assumption, my first step is to explore everything and avoid the conversations the game does not force you into. Look and click on everything the game lets you. Pick up what you are allowed to grab. This saves you a lot of time and energy later when you need an object for a puzzle. Seeing certain files or images triggers conversations later on. Clicking one object or seeing a poster may open up a triggered event that progresses the game. Stopping to read the information you need later and taking notes on it is a great idea. Not sure you need it? Take notes anyway.

Photo by Red Around the World

Speaking of taking notes, let me enlighten you on how some games work - mostly the oldest ones. Phone numbers and other details are added to Nancy's journal or phone automatically on newer games, but not the oldest ones. Write down everything and make sure you have the numbers and info you need to finish puzzles. The less you have to come back to places, the more you solve in a quicker time. It is wise to write it down (especially phone numbers!) and then check the journal to see if it was put in. Checklists are the same concept. Senior level lacks a checklist entirely in newer games, but still includes the journal entries (thankfully). 

Once you get to the point of finding puzzles and you haven't spoken to those who didn't flag you down, go solve what you can. People give you tasks. Get what you can reasonably solve finished before you get any more. If the game does not let you solve it you may have to do something else to make Nancy touch it. From here we can go into conversations after you can't do anything else.

The Characters

Here we are, all ready to talk to people who give Nancy tasks in order for her to get something in return. Chore-heavy games are loved by some people and hated by others. Conversations can be entertaining and open doors to puzzles. Not all conversation is necessary, however, so you can avoid some chit-chat if you so desire to. This depends entirely on the game itself. All of them have certain conversations that need to happen or you can't continue. 

Photo by Gamerzone

Secrets can kill is an extreme case of this due to the way it was programmed. One conversation option can stall you into starting the game over entirely. This is the only game to do this. You lose options as the conversation continues, too, so be careful on this game in particular. The others are not nearly as finicky as this. You are at the end of the game, too, when you can stall out; this is straight-up awful if you have to restart it all. Keep save files often. It is a good game, yes, but you need to be aware of this from the start.

Anyway, conversations trigger events, which trigger more conversation, which leads you into the plot and some new locations. When stuck on what to do you should talk to everyone (older games are built like this). Phone calls are sometimes important and other times optional. Ned or Bess and George will call you in some games if you don't call them. There are times where you can use them for hints on junior mode. In Alibi In Ashes you need to call them and play as them to finish the game itself. Necessary or not depends on the game, in the general sense. I find Nancy's friends to be fun conversations and they make me laugh.

Puzzles and Mini Games

Mini games are what I love in a Nancy Drew game. Others may not agree, but we are all allowed to have our opinions on what makes games beloved. Often you can play them after you are required to (and if they are in the game, you probably have to at some point). You can make money off these for souvenirs or needed objects to solve puzzles. I have save files labeled "mini games" so I don't have to play the whole game to play the mini games. It's brilliant! Also, the dossiers that are arcade style have a mini game arcade and you can play just mini games, which is so beautiful to me.

Photo by Gamepressure

The main puzzles are a joy or a pain, which depends upon the puzzle itself. If you are playing a harder or puzzle-heavy game you might find that one puzzle is insanely hard for you and others are shockingly easy. Or it may all be so hard and you want to quit. My advice is to step back and relax. Do something else until you can logically process what you need to solve it. If you give up, Game Boomers are a great help with their walkthroughs. I wouldn't have solved all the games without it. Do try to do it yourself, first, if you can.

I have a strategy for doing the puzzles. I pick one location and do everything I can, then move to another location and do everything......and so on. I do this until I can solve every puzzle and have the means to do them all. Puzzles pop up later, as usual, but it is less overwhelming to do things this way. The newer games tend to overwhelm me with puzzles and I found this to be the solution. 

Awards and Eggs

These games have phone charms to find, Easter eggs to find by doing absurd things, and awards to unlock and win. I suggest doing the game without the goal of this added incentive first, then looking up a walkthrough that tells you how to get these extra objects and awards. People found these by literally clicking everything a lot and playing around with the game. Go stand on their shoulders and go easy on yourself. The eggs sometimes help you skip puzzles and finish tasks. Other times they are just fun to acquire. 

Why You Should Try Every Game Before You Go By Reviews

Everyone who plays these has a different favorite game, literally everyone. Some hate MID, others like it, and others are right in between (for example). I have come back to games I disliked as a kid and I like them more as an adult. My point is simple; try it before you decide it isn't good because not everyone has your standard of what's fun. 

There are three aspects to a mystery game, which are storyline, puzzles, and interrogation. Some of these games have more puzzles than interrogation or vice versa. Some have a weak storyline and others have a strong storyline. Graphics are sometimes not good and other times beautiful. You like what you like and that is okay. You can disagree with rankings all day long and be fine. In this way, you decide what you enjoy, not the ranking videos and articles. Give them all an equal chance and see what ranking you create. This is your downtime and you can do what you want with it. 

Student Stress Management

 Consider this your how-to manual on College stress. This unique time in life needs some sort of manual, so here is your how-to on how to survive college stresses. 

Photo by Meme

Rule of thumb, try to stay organized and don't over-socialize yourself (especially as an introvert). If you are single don't focus on finding a relationship. In short, balance your social, dating, and classwork time into something manageable. Can you always maintain that? Heck to the no, but trying to helps. 

Dorms and Off-Campus Roommates

You'd think this would go under people, but no, it is its own category. You see, roommates and other people are two different things. Living with someone and going to class with someone do not function the same way. You get to see all the quirks of your roommate in close quarters. Be prepared for some conflict. If their dating relationships get complicated you will have a front-row seat and vice-versa if yours become complicated. They feel that direct impact.

Photo by Pinterest

If you don't know them well, make a contract. I know this sounds formal - stick with me here - but, whenever you have a conflict you will need it. Keep communication open and honest. Make sure that you solve the conflicts and disputes that come up between you quickly. Work it out. If you can't, I would suggest changing roommates and finding someone a bit easier to get on with. Make sure you talk about things and give them grace. Make sure you work out your kinks, as well as expecting them to do the same. 

Having multiple roommates becomes a bit crazy. You have many different personalities in the same place. A word on boyfriends; they muck things up a bit. The same can happen with girlfriends, but still, women and dating get kind of dramatic (and not in a theatrical way). Be honest with each other. Be careful whom you choose to live with. You have to talk to them every day of the semester and deal with their quirks all the time. I have a good relationship with my last college roommate and lived with her for two years minus Summers. We had some conflicts, yes, but we worked it out. 

People are not perfect. Personalities clash. We all know that small spaces like dorms don't often have entertaining space built-in (and if they do, you paid more for it). My dorm rooms were two desks, two beds, and a shared suite bathroom (or a community bathroom). Off-campus housing is different because of the room to entertain friends without seeing your bedrooms as living rooms. If you don't have the tidiest bedroom you are exposed to all your roommate's friends for it in a dorm. Introverts, you need to have a space to be by yourself somewhere on campus. Dorms and even shared rental housing are not private enough. Whether it be your car, the library, or a corner of campus seldom walked on you need a space for your introversion. Extroverts will not have this problem and want just the opposite.

Homework

I found a method that worked for me. Allow me to share my method. You take every syllabus you get and tape it to the wall, highlighting what is due next and crossing it off as you finish it. Pick one day where you have nothing planned and do as much homework as possible (mine was Saturday). Put it in order of closest to the farthest due date. Make it a priority to get the next day's done and then look at how much time and brainpower you have left. Any energy left? Go for the day after that. Try to finish at least two days of homework for maximum chill time for the next two days. 

Photo by YourTango

As for pulling an all-nighter, well, try not to. Sleep is vital to your energy and intelligence. You have to sleep. What I used to do was (combined with the above situation) set a time of night where I stopped whatever I was working on no matter what it was. I would try to finish it in the commuter lounge (if possible), but I did not make myself stay up late at night unless it was a large project due at a morning class. 

Planners are helpful here because you need to balance your social time and homework time. Write it down. Stress makes you forget things. Do you think you'll remember? You won't. Trust me on this. I missed important things and overbooked myself not using a planner. Use it! You will need and want it. Heed this warning or be late/miss important events.

People

College and socializing is a unique time. This is somewhere between high school and full adulthood for most students (traditional-aged). I'd say you should take full advantage of the situation. As an adult, I do not have much time for theatre due to working my second part-time job, yet I lived and breathed theatre as a Malone student. If I wasn't in the dorm I was at a show working the ticket booth or rehearsing. I loved it. Don't let the opportunities pass by for campus life. You don't get the freedom of this time again. 

Photo by Quickmeme

That being said, find people who are mature and try to grow up yourself. College should attract mature humans that have something better to do than gossip, and yet, I had as much issue with gossip as high school. Dating did have something to do with this, yes, but not all of it. Find your tribe and you will be better off. Most of them were in the theatre in my case. As college rolls on the people who haven't grown up will stick out like neon highlighters and sometimes end up more alone than others. Someone alone is not the neon sign by itself; the neon sign you are looking for is when others avoid them or the group around them is filled with negativity and drama. These people group together (minus some people who got stuck in their mess). The ones that grow up split off into other groups and move on. 

I have made friends for life by living on and off-campus. I have found the people I need to avoid by doing the same. You live, learn, and move on into maturity. Give others grace. Give yourself grace. I do, however, caution you to not stick around toxic groups. If you do stay there you'll be poisoned by the atmosphere. If your life is full of drama test whether it is you, your friends, your relationship, or an outside force of some kind. If it is your relationship or friends that are toxic, run and go find some new friends. Should it be you, correct yourself. You are responsible for your choices. 

Self-Care

What? Self-care? You heard me. Go take care of your body and pick a chill day to relax. It makes all the difference in the world to go out with friends for appetizers or stay in with a cozy book. Take a breather from your work and loosen up for at least a short while. Movie nights, a chill day of doing nothing, reading for a bit, and going on some fun days with your tribe are all good ideas for letting go of your stress. 

Bathe, shower, sleep, eat, drink water, make time for prayer and your Bible......etc. If you don't care for yourself and your faith (in my case) you'll start to lose it mentally. This means that if you can't handle anything at all socially you can stay in and not accept the offer to go out for dinner. Truly, don't feel bad about this. If you have to go disappear for a short time you are able to do so. This is easier to do when you are rooming alone and single. 

There are times when you need a counselor to talk to. There are times when you need to talk out everything with a friend and just have them be a sounding board (choose carefully). Do it. Go journal and let all that out. Need to release emotion? Do it. Mental health is connected to every part of your body and matters greatly. Take care of the mind God gave you. Without your sanity, you can't function.

Conclusion

Stress is rampant on college campuses. Please, take care of your bodily needs and mental needs. Take the time to relax after your classes. Put yourself in balance. Remember, the world will not end if your paper isn't perfect or you are too tired to finish something the night before. You are still accomplishing something great. If you have to try a class again, do it. You can do this and I believe in you all! When finals week comes you will crush it and rock those final papers! 

Photo by YourTango

When I was a student I had lots of trouble keeping my sanity. There are outside factors that I will not talk about in a public blog post. If you know me personally you might know about some of them. What you may not know is that I had a blue period and had to deal with my muddled emotions after years of ignoring them (around the beginning of sophomore year, I think). I told almost no one about my struggles for that short time. God got me through all of that blue period and led me out into a healthy perspective on dating and life. Please talk to someone if you are struggling with the aftershocks of a bad relationship or dealing with any sort of mental issues. Don't go it alone. You don't have to have it all together. No one has it all together and everyone is winging it. 

 

Jurassic Park - an overview

Jurassic Park started as two books, branched into five movies, and has several games out. Is there a difference in plot when we compare all three forms of the franchise? Let's dive into it. 

Photo by Parade

This Post is covered in spoiler alerts for everything, so if you want to be surprised by anything go read another blog post on my page, such as Is Jurassic Park Possible .

Jurassic Park, the original books, were written by Michael Crichton, who writes other thrillers aside from the two-book series. I have both books and the conclusion I came to comparing book and movies was that they chopped up the books and took creative liberties (lots of them), but left the characters well represented. I'd say the same about some Bond novels, too, but less creative liberties were taken in that series.

I will warn you that I have not played most of the games and am only going by reviews. I think they are a bit intense for me and I, quite possibly, might be awful at playing them control-wise. After I read the reviews I'll decide from there. I may play them someday after my research is finished. From what I know of the games, they take the creative liberties the movies didn't think of. Plot thread unfinished? Cue the Jurassic Park games. And with that, we begin. 

The Books

It has been a while since I read them (and I will again, I promise), so Sparknotes gets the credit for catching me up on little details, which is why I left a spoiler warning for everything here. I am leaving no stone unrevealed in differences. 

Photo by Amazon

It does start in Costa Rica- but among the locals this time! Little Compsognathus (the tiny ones that eat people in large herds) are eating the elderly and children. They got on those supply boats going back to the mainland and got into the villages. One of the many details that the movie left out is that they give off drugs of euphoria when they bite someone and are bird-like. Short explanation, the victims don't scream and a nanny found Compsognathus (Compies, for short) eating a child in a crib. John Hammond is dead at the end of book 1 because compies got him and he was thoroughly drugged by the bites of each compie. The movies show screaming, yet the books reflect there wouldn't be screaming (which is somehow more horrifying). The dinosaur population is already going rogue. The Costa Rican people and government are not happy. 

Lost World is actually supposed to be where all the genetic mistakes went. Yes, there were genetic mistakes and they hid them on Island B. The ecosystem is out of balance to the point that velociraptors are eating and trampling their own young. The herbivore and carnivore populations are not balanced at all on Island B. It is truly awful. You see the first book show the velociraptors raising young with care and the second book contrasts that with trampled nests, two raptors ripping apart a young one of their own species, and general chaos among the raptors. The food supply was low and the children were not being cared for in an effort for the older ones to have food. The movie does not show this to be the case.

The first island is bombed after the first book. No one could have returned to it because Costa Rica just destroyed it without consulting much of anyone. They got the people who were alive off of it and dropped a bomb on it. I think they had the right idea, in retrospect, after the genetic monsters Hammond created went after their elderly and kids. It was an ethically bad idea to start with, as we all know, so Costa Rica may have been in the right. 

The only characters they messed with were the kids, actually, but only because they reversed their personalities. The boy is the nerd and the girl is into sports. The girl wore on me as I read the book, to be honest. She was kind of obnoxious. Like I said, reverse the personalities. I will say that some characters weren't used. 

The tone of this book is both a yes and no match to the movies. Jurassic World matches the level of death and destruction in the books. Content? A little out there, but tone was perfect. Jurassic Park movies (the first three) are a bit tame compared to the books. Given the time period it makes sense. The books are filled with little details and images that, once you think about them, make you realize how intense and dark they really are. They are not horror, but the movies get closer and closer to the genre as we go.

I could go on for a while on how they chopped up chapters, changed plots, and added content to milk it for movies (all of them good). I have no problem with the content differences and enjoy both versions. Not everyone feels that way. While there are scenes that are verbatim dialogue in the movies, they took from one book, then the other in the same movie. It is far from the same. 

Dinosaurs are feathered in the book. Reptile skin? No, feathers! That is a major difference in the books and movies.

Movies

Jurassic Park and Jurassic World are two different time periods of filmmaking. The complexities of the books are not going to fit into a whole film. You'd need budget and CGI out the wazoo for an exact replica. Would I watch it? Probably, but most audiences are not going to sit for over three hours. 

Photo by Jurassic World Wiki

World takes on a modern perspective and creates dinosaurs that look so real that we mourn for their deaths by Indominus and are shocked by their horrible treatment when Ingen comes in. If you are crying as the dinosaurs are forced off the island in Fallen Kingdom you are not alone. The first three movies don't have this effect. This is due to how fake they look in comparison to World's representation of them. World is also more realistic to what would happen in today's world, should Jurassic Park be real. Some might say it looks too real. They took the plotlines a bit far. Aside from that, I loved it. 

The first three movies are closer to the books in nature of plot. The closer you are to the original source, the less you vary from it. It is equally good and worth owning for yourself. These don't have as intense of a tone as the newest movies do. The time period had a lot to do with that. They still look good, yes, but they are not as realistic. I can rewatch these and not feel an emotion for the animals. They also make it seem like it isn't reality, which makes a difference. If it seems like it couldn't happen in real life (it can't, scientifically) people have less of an emotional reaction. 

Lego Jurassic Park is for kids. It ends in some weird, peaceful ending and it is kind of bizarre. I don't think I have to explain why a kids movie would skip the death and destruction. All the same, it doesn't necessarily make sense to adapt this to a kids movie. 

The Games

This is not an area I am an expert in. Please give me grace in this category. If I am wrong about something, comment and I will correct it. 

It started at NES in 1993 and continues today. I don't have the space to go into every game. Some of them are lego, some are park builders, some are survival, and some are dinosaurs fighting each other. I did play one parking building game on facebook for a short time, but I don't think it is anywhere near the same as the survival games. Several games are labeled Lost World. One is where you can survive as a human or a dinosaur. The older games are quite clunky to play. You can play arcade games of Jurassic Park in some arcades.

If  I understand correctly, almost none of the games are based on the books. Most audiences are going to see the movie first. Obviously, it makes sense to a marketing team that you want to point to your cash cow. Most games are like that when taken from a movie. Jurassic Park is definitely a cash cow at this point. 

Conclusion

Jurassic Park does need to be careful of running themselves into the ground. In this way, it'd be wise to stop at this next movie and give themselves a concrete end to the series. You can agree and disagree with me. This is only my opinion. 

I would suggest reading the books and watching the movies. Both are equally wonderful. They are not the same plotlines, yet they are both intriguing thrillers. Try the games, if you like. Let me know how some of the games work and I may try them. 

As always, give me any topics you want to hear about, and God bless!

Sources:

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/book-vs-flick-jurassic-park

https://twobeardgaming.com/2018/10/life-uh-finds-a-way-a-complete-history-of-the-jurassic-park-video-games-franchise/

Book Situations and the Best Forms of Book

 Readers everywhere know that a physical book doesn't work for going running, an audiobook of an adult novel (if no headphones are around) does not work in public places, and an ebook does not download when your internet is down. Today we look at the pluses and minuses of every form of a book and reading app. 

Photo by Buzzfeed

An audiobook is defined here as "an [audio file], audiocassette or CD recording of a reading of a book, typically a novel". It can come in CD or MP3 form. Tapes are rare and often lack a player at this point.

An Ebook is defined as "an electronic version of a printed book that can be read on a computer or handheld device designed specifically for this purpose".  There are several apps for this.

A physical book is "a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers". 

These are the defined terms I'm going by for this blog post. today we talk about the pros and cons of all these forms.

Ebooks

This form of a book requires no physical bookshelf, a plus if you don't have the space. Another plus to this form is that it tends to be cheaper. Why? Because of Kindle/Kobo deals, lack of paper use, and other factors that make books cheap. Hardbacks vs ebook deals tend to be significantly different. Yes, some still cost a bit, but you get more here than a physical book store - and from your own house with no gas cost!

Photo By Pinterest

Another pro for this type is that you can't lose your bookmark in your bag or purse because the computer app or phone app keeps it updated. Book damage? Not possible. You can even make the text the size you want. Your phone and morning reading is one item in your purse or part of your many apps on your laptop (unless you have an e-reader). You can take notes on it without damage to a page. You can even go onto your library website for a book to borrow (if your library has a digital option). 

The downside here is that you require internet or data to download on the go. If your internet is terrible and the smallest download is too much you are out of luck. No data? Can't go online shopping or on your library site. You might be able to read the book you downloaded previously, but that's it. 

Another con would be the action of staring at a screen for hours. Yes, we all do nowadays, but if you need to avoid that situation in your spare time it might benefit you to not read primarily ebooks. Our eyes are strained with too much screen time. It doesn't help you sleep and if you are reading to relax into a sleepy state, well, on-screen books make no sense.

The perfect situation for the ebook is when you need a book on a budget quick, while also having good access to the internet. If the screentime is not an issue for you this is a way to save space in your dorm room, apartment, or home. Also, some authors have stuff on the ebook apps that you won't find in large bookstores (because some authors are only online or have a small name). Basically, if you need it today from the library or Kindle, go for the ebook. 

Audiobook

This is the road trip go-to for many people traveling for vacations, family gatherings, and long treks to work. It has a CD form, an audio file form, and even tapes (if you can play them on anything). You can even find classic books read out loud for free on YouTube (if the book is public domain by now). Doing your knitting or crocheting and need some sound to break the silence? Try this! 

Most you have to pay for or get from the library. These are sometimes more expensive and sometimes cheap. It is a coin toss and based on the author themselves. You can find sales and get some great ones for less than three dollars if you look at the right places. It depends on where you look online. You can get emails with great offers for both audio and ebooks. Check the sales section online.

Photo by Reddit

The voice speed is adjustable on apps like Chirp, but I don't think all audiobooks can have that luxury, especially when read out loud over YouTube and recorded on a CD or audio file. Regardless of the speed itself you can still fold your laundry and read your book at the same time. Headphones or not is your choice. Speaking of headphones, this is great for going a run or walk in the park (just as long as you pay attention to the surroundings and people around you). If you zip the audio file right to your MP3 player and make sure it is in order you are golden. Plane travel? Put on those headphones and listen to your novel (pre-download it before boarding!). The person beside you may not bother you (assuming you are avoiding conversations).

Students that learn via audio are probably going to love having a textbook read to them, especially if they can adjust speed (no guarantees). The blind also greatly benefit because audiobooks are more common than braille. Anyone who has trouble reading with their vision will find these refreshing. Contrary to what some humans think, the book is the same whether or not someone heard it or read it. 

The downside is that if the reader screwed it up you miss a section of your book. Downloading something incorrectly is also terrible because you lose whole chapters of the novel you are enjoying. In this way, make sure you are patient and have the whole novel in your computer or MP3 files. I have made this mistake before and it is frustrating.

Oddly enough, make sure your files are in order on your MP3 player if you take them from a CD or audio file to your MP3. Why? Because your player may throw them out of order. You can go from chapter 2 to 16 in one audio track due to this weirdness. For help on this, click here and be amazed. When you are driving it matters. 

A word of warning, please make sure you can focus on the road if you intend to bring it on your road trip. If you cannot listen to a book and drive responsibly you shouldn't be listening to it while your car is running. 

Physical Book

The classic binding-and-cover book gives any room a soul. It gives the house a personality, should you have the shelving space. Paperback is generally cheaper than a hardcover in the general sense. The older or fancier the cover, the more money you pay for it, but aside from that you can enjoy it just as much as the other forms. No Wi-fi needed! It is perfect for when the power is out, you are avoiding screens, or you just want to do something that requires no internet connection. Books were what humans used to ignore someone with before the cellphone. No screen damage to your eyes, either.

Photo by LiveAbout

Collectors will pay money for collectible books. Classics in leather binding, first editions, and other goodies are worth money to some individuals. There are people out there who admire their books and barely read them. Digital forms don't have this appeal. In this case, you do need a place to store them that won't harm the older editions. Collecting is not simply having a bookshelf; they show it off like a museum does. 

Physical books can cost more money due to printing costs. If you can find discount books and hobby bookstore owners you are in luck. Used books are just as wonderful as new ones. Places like Books-A-Million are not cheap. Amazon and Barnes and Noble can get expensive, too, but do offer used ones at highly discounted prices or rentals. Students know that textbooks can cost a bit. Anyone who loves reading can spend at least fifty dollars at a bookstore (cough couch, me, cough cough).

One thing you know for sure is that the reader didn't mess up and skip a chapter because you are the reader. Reading is also a vital skill for all of our lives. You can only learn it through visual reading. Schools still use textbooks in physical form (at least in my experience) in order to teach young children how to read. The physical book should never disappear. The library will make sure of that as long as it lives and breathes. 

The downside was touched on in the first paragraph, which is money and space to store the books themselves. It is also hard to carry around large novels if your purse or bag is tiny. I spend money on books in all forms, anyway, but if you are on a budget go to your local library. You may not be able to keep it forever, but you still get to read it. That is the point of your public library systems. No space? The library will only lend it to you temporarily and you can set it on a counter until you finish it. The only money you have to pay is if you don't return it and get late fees.

Photo by JustPost

The best situation for physical books is when you are doing one thing at a time, reading to a child or having a child read to you, or teaching. This is also great for reading along with an audiobook, should you want to do that. You can be sure your narrator didn't skip words if you read along. Waiting rooms and waiting for anything are great places to pull out a book. Traveling on planes are great places to read, but you should know some humans don't see a book as "leave me alone" (if you are trying to discourage conversations). 

Reading Apps and Where to find books

Reading apps like Kobo and Kindle have brands attached to them and you can buy e-readers for these brands. The apps themselves can go on about any device (though kobo and amazon tablets won't work together because amazon and kindle are owned by the same people). Even your laptop can have the reading apps on it, in case you don't have space on your phone for much. I can vouch for both apps.

Kobo and Kindle can both bookmark, take notes, change text size, and play audiobooks. They are remarkably similar, but there are also different authors on each app. It is good to have both in order to find those small-time authors who have amazing books. Kobo tends to make the first of a series free and then make you buy the rest, so you have a preview in case the series is awful. Kindle can sometimes give you perks if you subscribe to audible or Amazon Prime.

 The United States catalog of Kindle is bigger than Canada's catalog, though, so it depends on location. Kobo is better for Canada in the catalog. If you want more than an e-reader you can go Kindle and get an Amazon tablet, but otherwise, the e-readers themselves only do books. For more differences, click here. 

Overdrive (the online library) can work extremely well for MP3 players, especially if your car (aka, my car) lacks a CD player. In my case, I bought a player that was recommended for audiobooks. Just click here for suggestions on what to buy. Overdrive will zip what you borrowed from the library (all you need is a library card or a phone number) to your MP3 player in numbered parts. If you have to mess with the reordering process because your player is weird, look back at the audiobooks section for that link on how to do that. You can even place holds on ebooks and audiobooks. 

Your pubic library is always there for you, online and in person. The humans who work there are nice people. Show them your love and pick up a book anytime. They even have some sales on books they aren't keeping occasionally and that's a great place for cheap books. CD audiobooks are here for you if you have the car that plays them (which is becoming less common). Audiotapes are now bordering on rare, much like the cars that have tape players, yet you can find an adapter for playing those in your car. 

Chirp, an app that I got for cheap audiobooks, will only work on its own app (no transfer to MP3) and is a bit of a pain that way. Yet, some fantastic big names are on sale there for less than three dollars. I'd say it is worth it for home or if your phone can play it, but otherwise, you might be a bit disappointed. Just do your research on the apps you find with cheap books before you decide to do anything. 

I missed a few apps here and there, I'm sure, so click here for more and do your own research. 

Bonus! Bible Apps

Here we are for the bonus content - a Bible app showcase. First, let me tell you what I use, and then we can talk about a few more. 

I try to read my Bible reading plan daily on YouVersion, which I highly suggest because it keeps you reminded and on track. It even gives you several reading plans to choose from and they vary in length. Added devotions show up with the list of reading that day. It keeps track of record streaks of reading (aka opening the app) and that motivates me to create streaks, boosting my Bible reading habit. It can read to you if you are an audio reader. The app comes on Apple, Android, and Amazon devices.

Photo by Tithe.ly

Bible.is has many languages and translations. You can listen to dramatized audio if you like. It keeps track of where you are. Some said that some readings weren't available, but I'm not sure how much limitation there is. You can control the speed, apparently, as well as control text size. I didn't use it, so try it and tell me what you think of it. 

ESV Crossways may not be the best because I see reviews on how it changed for the worst. I think this is only the ESV study bible. It costs money to get extras. I read several reviews and most of them were negative. Here, I'll let you look at them - reviews here! I'm fairly certain you should not get this one.

Glo Bible is known for being pretty dang awesome, and the review I read is right here. Maps, virtual tours, HD video, and customizable reading plans are all in this app. Social media features allow sharing of the Bible verses onto your Facebook and Twitter. You can take notes on the app easily and see different translations. Researching Biblical topics on this is easy with a topical map to explore. It is free and then there is a premium version (but you may have to pay a bit to get this). Some versions of the text cost money (5 dollars -ish per version).

From here I will let you look at more of these on your own, due to the sheer amount of them. The link is here if you want to look at more options for yourself. There are ten of them listed on the provided link. Have fun!

Harry Potter and the Christian Community

 Harry Potter has the Christian world divided. Either a parent reads the books to their child (and rereads them by themselves because they love them) or decides that they are of the devil and must be forbidden. Yes, some parents may be in the middle and I acknowledge that, but is there evidence on both sides of the debate? Let's dive into it. 

Photo Courtesy of The Conversation

The Harry Potter fandom is huge everywhere. The first editions of the books are worth money. It is quality fiction, in my opinion, and worth at least looking into. I know people who made the books forbidden and their kids dove into the fandom anyway (and they could do nothing about it). 

The main plot is that young Harry Potter is informed that he is a wizard and should attend Hogwarts. While there he discovers Voldemort - I mean, He Who Shall Not Be Named - is trying to kill him because he tried to kill him before and failed. I won't give anything more away. 

Some Christian parents that I know read the books to their kids in order to be sure of what Harry Potter was before jumping to conclusions (and loved the series). Others, unfortunately, did not and decided that it was evil without doing their research at all. I'm going to try to respectfully represent both sides. 

It isn't evil

First of all, if you know real life from fantasy you aren't going to have much of a problem with the series or the fun fandom stuff (butterbeer, chocolate frogs, cosplay) that comes with it. If you are not able to tell reality from the fictional worlds in books you have serious problems and shouldn't be reading any fiction at all (and I know some disorders do cause this, by the way, so I'm not making fun of anyone - I'm being serious).

JK Rowling also claims that it has Christian ideas planted in it, like the Christ rising again (Harry Potter killed and suddenly living). The hiccup is that some people couldn't get past the fantasy world to get into it and see it, given witchcraft is forbidden in the Bible. The only difference between this and LOTR or Narnia is that Rowling is not known well in Christian circles, which makes a difference in the Christian community and determines whether strict parents allow it. Many people grow to adulthood and find the books are not satanic.  The fact is that some parents overreacted and didn't do the research they should have. 

 

Did you know that Latin is highly used in Harry Potter? Expecto Patronum means "I await a guardian" in Latin. All they are doing is speaking Latin into the air while holding wands. I don't believe she is emulating real witchcraft because of this and one other fact; only some people could use magic and others had no access to it, unlike real witchcraft, which anyone can pick up. Charles Colson claims that while there are spells cast the characters don't truly make any contact with the supernatural of real-life witchcraft at all. Colson also loved the show of loyalty and sacrifice for each other the trio of main characters portrayed. Some individuals also believe that the show of friendship and loyalty despite the risks was admirable and that doing the right thing regardless of the consequences was promoted in the series, even if Christianity wasn't.

Photo by Facebook

Some Wiccans did not like the series, and they don't want to be connected with it. Crazy? I know! With that sort of revelation, I'd like to say that it likely does not reflect Wiccan beliefs if they don't want to be near it. Don't believe me? Here is a quote from one of the sources at the end of the blog post.

The fundamentalists’ only allies in anti-Potterism were, interestingly enough, the Wiccans. "[M]any are unhappy that others believe the books have anything to do with the realities of their religion," Jan Glidewell reported in the St. Petersburg Times on November 16, 2001. "They said, correctly, that Harry’s flying brooms and transformational spells have about as much to do with Wicca as flying carpets have to do with Sufism, Easter bunnies with Christianity, or living in Miami Beach with Judaism."

Read that paragraph again and tell me that Wiccans are trying to tempt your kids. They aren't. 

It is evil

There are some who refute the Harry Potter books being Christian in series. They claim bad fantasy is marked with what can or can't be replicated. You can't replicate Gandalf's magic, but you can find astrology and spellbooks close to the world Rowling created, allegedly. Witchcraft is actually real. Children who copy everything can look into the occult from here easily because the subject was brought up (even if it is not accurately copied in the fiction itself). 

Photo by Facebook

Rowling does not have a presence in Christian circles, like I mentioned before, so we don't have proof she is a believer and is using it to further the gospel. She doesn't talk about her faith often, thus some come to the conclusion she isn't Christ-following. Rowling has explained it one way and others have contradicted her with their ideas, so some think that people misinterpreted her books as Christian morally. 

Witchcraft, of any kind, is evil. This is true. The Bible also tells us that witchcraft is forbidden. Harry Potter is set in a school that is purely teaching witchcraft, thus some parents decided that the books were forbidden, as well. This needs little explanation and is pretty straightforward.

It can be evil, but it depends 

Why is this category here? I'm so glad you asked! Here we have the people who are intelligent enough to know that kids copy everything at a certain age and geek out on what they love. If someone is not able to determine what is fictional and what is real this book is harmful and could truly lead them into the witchcraft section of a bookstore (only the spells are real). If they are grounded in their faith, mature enough to know what is a Harry Potter recipe book and what is a book on real witchcraft, and don't emulate every fiction they read it is totally not harmful. 

Do you need help determining if your child is mature enough for this? Let's give you some guidelines. 

1. Can they understand what is real and what isn't? If not, skip it for now. 

2. Do they emulate everything they see to the point that they might pick up a real spellbook? Skip it for now if this applies. 

3. How old are they? If they are old enough to enjoy fiction for what it is (a made-up world) they are totally okay to read it. At this point, you ought to be mature enough to not accidentally stumble into the wrong section of Books-A-Million. 

Rule of thumb, know your kids and what they tend to do with ideas. If you think they will actually walk into the occult after reading it (and you know what is truly in it, not just what so-and-so told you) don't offer it as a bedtime story or a car ride entertainment. Don't make a big deal out of it, either. If your kids have a grounded faith you ought to have no issues and they will probably find it on their own, anyway. 

A good guideline for age is necessary, and also because the reading level of the book matters. A five-year-old will not be able to truly appreciate a book with this much complexity. It is suggested that they can truly enjoy it (depending on their reading levels, of course) around 9 or 10 years and older. They do get intense after book 3, so I'd wait to introduce it to them until they are at this age.

Conclusions

Age and maturity have a lot to do with when kids can handle something and understand reality from fantasy. Fandoms talk about potions and spells, yes, but the world of Harry Potter magic (as described in the novel) was never real. Fans of the series know that if they can discern fiction from real life. I don't believe that it is the same as real witchcraft, which anyone can pick up. Parents declaring something forbidden will actually drive kids toward a series when their parents aren't around (and you never want your kids hiding their hobbies from you). We simply must calm down and think. 

Photo by Meme

Yes, witchcraft is not good, but the fantasy genre uses magic and sorcerers all the time. LOTR can get away with it, but yet Harry Potter can't? It just seems odd to me. There are TV shows out there now that are far more dangerous than Harry Potter ever was, like Supernatural, Motherland: Fort Salem, and The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina. Yet, here we are targeting comparably tame kid's books for witchcraft influence. This is not the only thing to worry about in media, so do your research on everything that looks like it portrays actual witchcraft because there is a lot out there (including Scooby-Doo and the Hex Girls!). 

I am not a parent, but I do think that you should watch stuff with your kids and discuss what they need to know. I know that when I have kids there will be one or two TV shows I won't introduce to them. Parents do have a responsibility to care for the minds of their kids. Once adulthood hits you are free of that responsibility and hopefully they have strong faith by then, but before adulthood comes you are there to protect them. Do the research you need to and know your kids. 

Sources:

https://baylorlariat.com/2018/11/15/harry-potter-satanic-witchcraft-or-christianity-inspired-narrative/

https://www1.cbn.com/books/harry-potter-harmless-christian-novel-or-doorway-to-the-occult

http://www2.trincoll.edu/csrpl/RINVol5No1/Harry%20Potter.htm

https://indianexpress.com/article/parenting/learning/jk-rowling-birthday-right-age-to-introduce-kids-to-harry-potter-5866724/

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2000/january10/29.37.html

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1999/december6/12.0a.html