Jurassic Park - an overview

Jurassic Park started as two books, branched into five movies, and has several games out. Is there a difference in plot when we compare all three forms of the franchise? Let's dive into it. 

Photo by Parade

This Post is covered in spoiler alerts for everything, so if you want to be surprised by anything go read another blog post on my page, such as Is Jurassic Park Possible .

Jurassic Park, the original books, were written by Michael Crichton, who writes other thrillers aside from the two-book series. I have both books and the conclusion I came to comparing book and movies was that they chopped up the books and took creative liberties (lots of them), but left the characters well represented. I'd say the same about some Bond novels, too, but less creative liberties were taken in that series.

I will warn you that I have not played most of the games and am only going by reviews. I think they are a bit intense for me and I, quite possibly, might be awful at playing them control-wise. After I read the reviews I'll decide from there. I may play them someday after my research is finished. From what I know of the games, they take the creative liberties the movies didn't think of. Plot thread unfinished? Cue the Jurassic Park games. And with that, we begin. 

The Books

It has been a while since I read them (and I will again, I promise), so Sparknotes gets the credit for catching me up on little details, which is why I left a spoiler warning for everything here. I am leaving no stone unrevealed in differences. 

Photo by Amazon

It does start in Costa Rica- but among the locals this time! Little Compsognathus (the tiny ones that eat people in large herds) are eating the elderly and children. They got on those supply boats going back to the mainland and got into the villages. One of the many details that the movie left out is that they give off drugs of euphoria when they bite someone and are bird-like. Short explanation, the victims don't scream and a nanny found Compsognathus (Compies, for short) eating a child in a crib. John Hammond is dead at the end of book 1 because compies got him and he was thoroughly drugged by the bites of each compie. The movies show screaming, yet the books reflect there wouldn't be screaming (which is somehow more horrifying). The dinosaur population is already going rogue. The Costa Rican people and government are not happy. 

Lost World is actually supposed to be where all the genetic mistakes went. Yes, there were genetic mistakes and they hid them on Island B. The ecosystem is out of balance to the point that velociraptors are eating and trampling their own young. The herbivore and carnivore populations are not balanced at all on Island B. It is truly awful. You see the first book show the velociraptors raising young with care and the second book contrasts that with trampled nests, two raptors ripping apart a young one of their own species, and general chaos among the raptors. The food supply was low and the children were not being cared for in an effort for the older ones to have food. The movie does not show this to be the case.

The first island is bombed after the first book. No one could have returned to it because Costa Rica just destroyed it without consulting much of anyone. They got the people who were alive off of it and dropped a bomb on it. I think they had the right idea, in retrospect, after the genetic monsters Hammond created went after their elderly and kids. It was an ethically bad idea to start with, as we all know, so Costa Rica may have been in the right. 

The only characters they messed with were the kids, actually, but only because they reversed their personalities. The boy is the nerd and the girl is into sports. The girl wore on me as I read the book, to be honest. She was kind of obnoxious. Like I said, reverse the personalities. I will say that some characters weren't used. 

The tone of this book is both a yes and no match to the movies. Jurassic World matches the level of death and destruction in the books. Content? A little out there, but tone was perfect. Jurassic Park movies (the first three) are a bit tame compared to the books. Given the time period it makes sense. The books are filled with little details and images that, once you think about them, make you realize how intense and dark they really are. They are not horror, but the movies get closer and closer to the genre as we go.

I could go on for a while on how they chopped up chapters, changed plots, and added content to milk it for movies (all of them good). I have no problem with the content differences and enjoy both versions. Not everyone feels that way. While there are scenes that are verbatim dialogue in the movies, they took from one book, then the other in the same movie. It is far from the same. 

Dinosaurs are feathered in the book. Reptile skin? No, feathers! That is a major difference in the books and movies.

Movies

Jurassic Park and Jurassic World are two different time periods of filmmaking. The complexities of the books are not going to fit into a whole film. You'd need budget and CGI out the wazoo for an exact replica. Would I watch it? Probably, but most audiences are not going to sit for over three hours. 

Photo by Jurassic World Wiki

World takes on a modern perspective and creates dinosaurs that look so real that we mourn for their deaths by Indominus and are shocked by their horrible treatment when Ingen comes in. If you are crying as the dinosaurs are forced off the island in Fallen Kingdom you are not alone. The first three movies don't have this effect. This is due to how fake they look in comparison to World's representation of them. World is also more realistic to what would happen in today's world, should Jurassic Park be real. Some might say it looks too real. They took the plotlines a bit far. Aside from that, I loved it. 

The first three movies are closer to the books in nature of plot. The closer you are to the original source, the less you vary from it. It is equally good and worth owning for yourself. These don't have as intense of a tone as the newest movies do. The time period had a lot to do with that. They still look good, yes, but they are not as realistic. I can rewatch these and not feel an emotion for the animals. They also make it seem like it isn't reality, which makes a difference. If it seems like it couldn't happen in real life (it can't, scientifically) people have less of an emotional reaction. 

Lego Jurassic Park is for kids. It ends in some weird, peaceful ending and it is kind of bizarre. I don't think I have to explain why a kids movie would skip the death and destruction. All the same, it doesn't necessarily make sense to adapt this to a kids movie. 

The Games

This is not an area I am an expert in. Please give me grace in this category. If I am wrong about something, comment and I will correct it. 

It started at NES in 1993 and continues today. I don't have the space to go into every game. Some of them are lego, some are park builders, some are survival, and some are dinosaurs fighting each other. I did play one parking building game on facebook for a short time, but I don't think it is anywhere near the same as the survival games. Several games are labeled Lost World. One is where you can survive as a human or a dinosaur. The older games are quite clunky to play. You can play arcade games of Jurassic Park in some arcades.

If  I understand correctly, almost none of the games are based on the books. Most audiences are going to see the movie first. Obviously, it makes sense to a marketing team that you want to point to your cash cow. Most games are like that when taken from a movie. Jurassic Park is definitely a cash cow at this point. 

Conclusion

Jurassic Park does need to be careful of running themselves into the ground. In this way, it'd be wise to stop at this next movie and give themselves a concrete end to the series. You can agree and disagree with me. This is only my opinion. 

I would suggest reading the books and watching the movies. Both are equally wonderful. They are not the same plotlines, yet they are both intriguing thrillers. Try the games, if you like. Let me know how some of the games work and I may try them. 

As always, give me any topics you want to hear about, and God bless!

Sources:

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/book-vs-flick-jurassic-park

https://twobeardgaming.com/2018/10/life-uh-finds-a-way-a-complete-history-of-the-jurassic-park-video-games-franchise/

Book Situations and the Best Forms of Book

 Readers everywhere know that a physical book doesn't work for going running, an audiobook of an adult novel (if no headphones are around) does not work in public places, and an ebook does not download when your internet is down. Today we look at the pluses and minuses of every form of a book and reading app. 

Photo by Buzzfeed

An audiobook is defined here as "an [audio file], audiocassette or CD recording of a reading of a book, typically a novel". It can come in CD or MP3 form. Tapes are rare and often lack a player at this point.

An Ebook is defined as "an electronic version of a printed book that can be read on a computer or handheld device designed specifically for this purpose".  There are several apps for this.

A physical book is "a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers". 

These are the defined terms I'm going by for this blog post. today we talk about the pros and cons of all these forms.

Ebooks

This form of a book requires no physical bookshelf, a plus if you don't have the space. Another plus to this form is that it tends to be cheaper. Why? Because of Kindle/Kobo deals, lack of paper use, and other factors that make books cheap. Hardbacks vs ebook deals tend to be significantly different. Yes, some still cost a bit, but you get more here than a physical book store - and from your own house with no gas cost!

Photo By Pinterest

Another pro for this type is that you can't lose your bookmark in your bag or purse because the computer app or phone app keeps it updated. Book damage? Not possible. You can even make the text the size you want. Your phone and morning reading is one item in your purse or part of your many apps on your laptop (unless you have an e-reader). You can take notes on it without damage to a page. You can even go onto your library website for a book to borrow (if your library has a digital option). 

The downside here is that you require internet or data to download on the go. If your internet is terrible and the smallest download is too much you are out of luck. No data? Can't go online shopping or on your library site. You might be able to read the book you downloaded previously, but that's it. 

Another con would be the action of staring at a screen for hours. Yes, we all do nowadays, but if you need to avoid that situation in your spare time it might benefit you to not read primarily ebooks. Our eyes are strained with too much screen time. It doesn't help you sleep and if you are reading to relax into a sleepy state, well, on-screen books make no sense.

The perfect situation for the ebook is when you need a book on a budget quick, while also having good access to the internet. If the screentime is not an issue for you this is a way to save space in your dorm room, apartment, or home. Also, some authors have stuff on the ebook apps that you won't find in large bookstores (because some authors are only online or have a small name). Basically, if you need it today from the library or Kindle, go for the ebook. 

Audiobook

This is the road trip go-to for many people traveling for vacations, family gatherings, and long treks to work. It has a CD form, an audio file form, and even tapes (if you can play them on anything). You can even find classic books read out loud for free on YouTube (if the book is public domain by now). Doing your knitting or crocheting and need some sound to break the silence? Try this! 

Most you have to pay for or get from the library. These are sometimes more expensive and sometimes cheap. It is a coin toss and based on the author themselves. You can find sales and get some great ones for less than three dollars if you look at the right places. It depends on where you look online. You can get emails with great offers for both audio and ebooks. Check the sales section online.

Photo by Reddit

The voice speed is adjustable on apps like Chirp, but I don't think all audiobooks can have that luxury, especially when read out loud over YouTube and recorded on a CD or audio file. Regardless of the speed itself you can still fold your laundry and read your book at the same time. Headphones or not is your choice. Speaking of headphones, this is great for going a run or walk in the park (just as long as you pay attention to the surroundings and people around you). If you zip the audio file right to your MP3 player and make sure it is in order you are golden. Plane travel? Put on those headphones and listen to your novel (pre-download it before boarding!). The person beside you may not bother you (assuming you are avoiding conversations).

Students that learn via audio are probably going to love having a textbook read to them, especially if they can adjust speed (no guarantees). The blind also greatly benefit because audiobooks are more common than braille. Anyone who has trouble reading with their vision will find these refreshing. Contrary to what some humans think, the book is the same whether or not someone heard it or read it. 

The downside is that if the reader screwed it up you miss a section of your book. Downloading something incorrectly is also terrible because you lose whole chapters of the novel you are enjoying. In this way, make sure you are patient and have the whole novel in your computer or MP3 files. I have made this mistake before and it is frustrating.

Oddly enough, make sure your files are in order on your MP3 player if you take them from a CD or audio file to your MP3. Why? Because your player may throw them out of order. You can go from chapter 2 to 16 in one audio track due to this weirdness. For help on this, click here and be amazed. When you are driving it matters. 

A word of warning, please make sure you can focus on the road if you intend to bring it on your road trip. If you cannot listen to a book and drive responsibly you shouldn't be listening to it while your car is running. 

Physical Book

The classic binding-and-cover book gives any room a soul. It gives the house a personality, should you have the shelving space. Paperback is generally cheaper than a hardcover in the general sense. The older or fancier the cover, the more money you pay for it, but aside from that you can enjoy it just as much as the other forms. No Wi-fi needed! It is perfect for when the power is out, you are avoiding screens, or you just want to do something that requires no internet connection. Books were what humans used to ignore someone with before the cellphone. No screen damage to your eyes, either.

Photo by LiveAbout

Collectors will pay money for collectible books. Classics in leather binding, first editions, and other goodies are worth money to some individuals. There are people out there who admire their books and barely read them. Digital forms don't have this appeal. In this case, you do need a place to store them that won't harm the older editions. Collecting is not simply having a bookshelf; they show it off like a museum does. 

Physical books can cost more money due to printing costs. If you can find discount books and hobby bookstore owners you are in luck. Used books are just as wonderful as new ones. Places like Books-A-Million are not cheap. Amazon and Barnes and Noble can get expensive, too, but do offer used ones at highly discounted prices or rentals. Students know that textbooks can cost a bit. Anyone who loves reading can spend at least fifty dollars at a bookstore (cough couch, me, cough cough).

One thing you know for sure is that the reader didn't mess up and skip a chapter because you are the reader. Reading is also a vital skill for all of our lives. You can only learn it through visual reading. Schools still use textbooks in physical form (at least in my experience) in order to teach young children how to read. The physical book should never disappear. The library will make sure of that as long as it lives and breathes. 

The downside was touched on in the first paragraph, which is money and space to store the books themselves. It is also hard to carry around large novels if your purse or bag is tiny. I spend money on books in all forms, anyway, but if you are on a budget go to your local library. You may not be able to keep it forever, but you still get to read it. That is the point of your public library systems. No space? The library will only lend it to you temporarily and you can set it on a counter until you finish it. The only money you have to pay is if you don't return it and get late fees.

Photo by JustPost

The best situation for physical books is when you are doing one thing at a time, reading to a child or having a child read to you, or teaching. This is also great for reading along with an audiobook, should you want to do that. You can be sure your narrator didn't skip words if you read along. Waiting rooms and waiting for anything are great places to pull out a book. Traveling on planes are great places to read, but you should know some humans don't see a book as "leave me alone" (if you are trying to discourage conversations). 

Reading Apps and Where to find books

Reading apps like Kobo and Kindle have brands attached to them and you can buy e-readers for these brands. The apps themselves can go on about any device (though kobo and amazon tablets won't work together because amazon and kindle are owned by the same people). Even your laptop can have the reading apps on it, in case you don't have space on your phone for much. I can vouch for both apps.

Kobo and Kindle can both bookmark, take notes, change text size, and play audiobooks. They are remarkably similar, but there are also different authors on each app. It is good to have both in order to find those small-time authors who have amazing books. Kobo tends to make the first of a series free and then make you buy the rest, so you have a preview in case the series is awful. Kindle can sometimes give you perks if you subscribe to audible or Amazon Prime.

 The United States catalog of Kindle is bigger than Canada's catalog, though, so it depends on location. Kobo is better for Canada in the catalog. If you want more than an e-reader you can go Kindle and get an Amazon tablet, but otherwise, the e-readers themselves only do books. For more differences, click here. 

Overdrive (the online library) can work extremely well for MP3 players, especially if your car (aka, my car) lacks a CD player. In my case, I bought a player that was recommended for audiobooks. Just click here for suggestions on what to buy. Overdrive will zip what you borrowed from the library (all you need is a library card or a phone number) to your MP3 player in numbered parts. If you have to mess with the reordering process because your player is weird, look back at the audiobooks section for that link on how to do that. You can even place holds on ebooks and audiobooks. 

Your pubic library is always there for you, online and in person. The humans who work there are nice people. Show them your love and pick up a book anytime. They even have some sales on books they aren't keeping occasionally and that's a great place for cheap books. CD audiobooks are here for you if you have the car that plays them (which is becoming less common). Audiotapes are now bordering on rare, much like the cars that have tape players, yet you can find an adapter for playing those in your car. 

Chirp, an app that I got for cheap audiobooks, will only work on its own app (no transfer to MP3) and is a bit of a pain that way. Yet, some fantastic big names are on sale there for less than three dollars. I'd say it is worth it for home or if your phone can play it, but otherwise, you might be a bit disappointed. Just do your research on the apps you find with cheap books before you decide to do anything. 

I missed a few apps here and there, I'm sure, so click here for more and do your own research. 

Bonus! Bible Apps

Here we are for the bonus content - a Bible app showcase. First, let me tell you what I use, and then we can talk about a few more. 

I try to read my Bible reading plan daily on YouVersion, which I highly suggest because it keeps you reminded and on track. It even gives you several reading plans to choose from and they vary in length. Added devotions show up with the list of reading that day. It keeps track of record streaks of reading (aka opening the app) and that motivates me to create streaks, boosting my Bible reading habit. It can read to you if you are an audio reader. The app comes on Apple, Android, and Amazon devices.

Photo by Tithe.ly

Bible.is has many languages and translations. You can listen to dramatized audio if you like. It keeps track of where you are. Some said that some readings weren't available, but I'm not sure how much limitation there is. You can control the speed, apparently, as well as control text size. I didn't use it, so try it and tell me what you think of it. 

ESV Crossways may not be the best because I see reviews on how it changed for the worst. I think this is only the ESV study bible. It costs money to get extras. I read several reviews and most of them were negative. Here, I'll let you look at them - reviews here! I'm fairly certain you should not get this one.

Glo Bible is known for being pretty dang awesome, and the review I read is right here. Maps, virtual tours, HD video, and customizable reading plans are all in this app. Social media features allow sharing of the Bible verses onto your Facebook and Twitter. You can take notes on the app easily and see different translations. Researching Biblical topics on this is easy with a topical map to explore. It is free and then there is a premium version (but you may have to pay a bit to get this). Some versions of the text cost money (5 dollars -ish per version).

From here I will let you look at more of these on your own, due to the sheer amount of them. The link is here if you want to look at more options for yourself. There are ten of them listed on the provided link. Have fun!

Harry Potter and the Christian Community

 Harry Potter has the Christian world divided. Either a parent reads the books to their child (and rereads them by themselves because they love them) or decides that they are of the devil and must be forbidden. Yes, some parents may be in the middle and I acknowledge that, but is there evidence on both sides of the debate? Let's dive into it. 

Photo Courtesy of The Conversation

The Harry Potter fandom is huge everywhere. The first editions of the books are worth money. It is quality fiction, in my opinion, and worth at least looking into. I know people who made the books forbidden and their kids dove into the fandom anyway (and they could do nothing about it). 

The main plot is that young Harry Potter is informed that he is a wizard and should attend Hogwarts. While there he discovers Voldemort - I mean, He Who Shall Not Be Named - is trying to kill him because he tried to kill him before and failed. I won't give anything more away. 

Some Christian parents that I know read the books to their kids in order to be sure of what Harry Potter was before jumping to conclusions (and loved the series). Others, unfortunately, did not and decided that it was evil without doing their research at all. I'm going to try to respectfully represent both sides. 

It isn't evil

First of all, if you know real life from fantasy you aren't going to have much of a problem with the series or the fun fandom stuff (butterbeer, chocolate frogs, cosplay) that comes with it. If you are not able to tell reality from the fictional worlds in books you have serious problems and shouldn't be reading any fiction at all (and I know some disorders do cause this, by the way, so I'm not making fun of anyone - I'm being serious).

JK Rowling also claims that it has Christian ideas planted in it, like the Christ rising again (Harry Potter killed and suddenly living). The hiccup is that some people couldn't get past the fantasy world to get into it and see it, given witchcraft is forbidden in the Bible. The only difference between this and LOTR or Narnia is that Rowling is not known well in Christian circles, which makes a difference in the Christian community and determines whether strict parents allow it. Many people grow to adulthood and find the books are not satanic.  The fact is that some parents overreacted and didn't do the research they should have. 

 

Did you know that Latin is highly used in Harry Potter? Expecto Patronum means "I await a guardian" in Latin. All they are doing is speaking Latin into the air while holding wands. I don't believe she is emulating real witchcraft because of this and one other fact; only some people could use magic and others had no access to it, unlike real witchcraft, which anyone can pick up. Charles Colson claims that while there are spells cast the characters don't truly make any contact with the supernatural of real-life witchcraft at all. Colson also loved the show of loyalty and sacrifice for each other the trio of main characters portrayed. Some individuals also believe that the show of friendship and loyalty despite the risks was admirable and that doing the right thing regardless of the consequences was promoted in the series, even if Christianity wasn't.

Photo by Facebook

Some Wiccans did not like the series, and they don't want to be connected with it. Crazy? I know! With that sort of revelation, I'd like to say that it likely does not reflect Wiccan beliefs if they don't want to be near it. Don't believe me? Here is a quote from one of the sources at the end of the blog post.

The fundamentalists’ only allies in anti-Potterism were, interestingly enough, the Wiccans. "[M]any are unhappy that others believe the books have anything to do with the realities of their religion," Jan Glidewell reported in the St. Petersburg Times on November 16, 2001. "They said, correctly, that Harry’s flying brooms and transformational spells have about as much to do with Wicca as flying carpets have to do with Sufism, Easter bunnies with Christianity, or living in Miami Beach with Judaism."

Read that paragraph again and tell me that Wiccans are trying to tempt your kids. They aren't. 

It is evil

There are some who refute the Harry Potter books being Christian in series. They claim bad fantasy is marked with what can or can't be replicated. You can't replicate Gandalf's magic, but you can find astrology and spellbooks close to the world Rowling created, allegedly. Witchcraft is actually real. Children who copy everything can look into the occult from here easily because the subject was brought up (even if it is not accurately copied in the fiction itself). 

Photo by Facebook

Rowling does not have a presence in Christian circles, like I mentioned before, so we don't have proof she is a believer and is using it to further the gospel. She doesn't talk about her faith often, thus some come to the conclusion she isn't Christ-following. Rowling has explained it one way and others have contradicted her with their ideas, so some think that people misinterpreted her books as Christian morally. 

Witchcraft, of any kind, is evil. This is true. The Bible also tells us that witchcraft is forbidden. Harry Potter is set in a school that is purely teaching witchcraft, thus some parents decided that the books were forbidden, as well. This needs little explanation and is pretty straightforward.

It can be evil, but it depends 

Why is this category here? I'm so glad you asked! Here we have the people who are intelligent enough to know that kids copy everything at a certain age and geek out on what they love. If someone is not able to determine what is fictional and what is real this book is harmful and could truly lead them into the witchcraft section of a bookstore (only the spells are real). If they are grounded in their faith, mature enough to know what is a Harry Potter recipe book and what is a book on real witchcraft, and don't emulate every fiction they read it is totally not harmful. 

Do you need help determining if your child is mature enough for this? Let's give you some guidelines. 

1. Can they understand what is real and what isn't? If not, skip it for now. 

2. Do they emulate everything they see to the point that they might pick up a real spellbook? Skip it for now if this applies. 

3. How old are they? If they are old enough to enjoy fiction for what it is (a made-up world) they are totally okay to read it. At this point, you ought to be mature enough to not accidentally stumble into the wrong section of Books-A-Million. 

Rule of thumb, know your kids and what they tend to do with ideas. If you think they will actually walk into the occult after reading it (and you know what is truly in it, not just what so-and-so told you) don't offer it as a bedtime story or a car ride entertainment. Don't make a big deal out of it, either. If your kids have a grounded faith you ought to have no issues and they will probably find it on their own, anyway. 

A good guideline for age is necessary, and also because the reading level of the book matters. A five-year-old will not be able to truly appreciate a book with this much complexity. It is suggested that they can truly enjoy it (depending on their reading levels, of course) around 9 or 10 years and older. They do get intense after book 3, so I'd wait to introduce it to them until they are at this age.

Conclusions

Age and maturity have a lot to do with when kids can handle something and understand reality from fantasy. Fandoms talk about potions and spells, yes, but the world of Harry Potter magic (as described in the novel) was never real. Fans of the series know that if they can discern fiction from real life. I don't believe that it is the same as real witchcraft, which anyone can pick up. Parents declaring something forbidden will actually drive kids toward a series when their parents aren't around (and you never want your kids hiding their hobbies from you). We simply must calm down and think. 

Photo by Meme

Yes, witchcraft is not good, but the fantasy genre uses magic and sorcerers all the time. LOTR can get away with it, but yet Harry Potter can't? It just seems odd to me. There are TV shows out there now that are far more dangerous than Harry Potter ever was, like Supernatural, Motherland: Fort Salem, and The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina. Yet, here we are targeting comparably tame kid's books for witchcraft influence. This is not the only thing to worry about in media, so do your research on everything that looks like it portrays actual witchcraft because there is a lot out there (including Scooby-Doo and the Hex Girls!). 

I am not a parent, but I do think that you should watch stuff with your kids and discuss what they need to know. I know that when I have kids there will be one or two TV shows I won't introduce to them. Parents do have a responsibility to care for the minds of their kids. Once adulthood hits you are free of that responsibility and hopefully they have strong faith by then, but before adulthood comes you are there to protect them. Do the research you need to and know your kids. 

Sources:

https://baylorlariat.com/2018/11/15/harry-potter-satanic-witchcraft-or-christianity-inspired-narrative/

https://www1.cbn.com/books/harry-potter-harmless-christian-novel-or-doorway-to-the-occult

http://www2.trincoll.edu/csrpl/RINVol5No1/Harry%20Potter.htm

https://indianexpress.com/article/parenting/learning/jk-rowling-birthday-right-age-to-introduce-kids-to-harry-potter-5866724/

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2000/january10/29.37.html

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1999/december6/12.0a.html

rare games

Video game companies, much like other companies, sometimes go out of business. This means games that aren't being made anymore get more expensive. You can sometimes find rare games unwittingly in the bin of used games, but often you have to make an effort to find these due to collectors and gaming nerds. Good games that are rare might be found on eBay - for a price. Do you know what games are rare? Do you have any rare games?

Photo by BBC

I recently looked for the game sequel of Hotel Dusk, only to find that it was 100 dollars to get the UK version and cheaper to get the Japanese version (and then it was only in Japanese). It was never released in North America. The games Hotel Dusk and Last Window are from a company that went out of business. They are incredible games worth the extra cost, if you like mystery novels that are interactive. 

There are amazing games out there that are rare because the company that made them isn't around. It is either that or they didn't make many of them and they discontinued that game. Great games don't guarantee success, sadly, so a fabulous, fun game doesn't mean the company lasts or the game gets a good reception from the public fanbase. We continue onward with a list of games and companies that are considered rare. 

Gaming Companies

There are many consoles included in the list below. A handful of these companies still exist in a weaker state, but many are finished making games. 

- Radical Entertainment  - Guerilla Cambridge  -  Silicon Knights  - Acclaim Entertainment 

- Zipper Interactive  - Bizarre Creations  - Psygnosis/ Sony Liverpool  - Lionhead Studios

- Free Radical Design  - Ensemble Studios  - Pandemic  - Clover Studios  - Visceral Games 

- Neversoft  - Midway

All of these are gaming companies with good quality games attached, including the games Mortal Kombat, Guitar Hero, Dead Space, Star Wars Battlefront, Age of Empires, and many more. A few of these are part of other companies by now. Others went bankrupt. Creative endeavors are not always successful - even if the game is the best thing ever made - because money and the arts are hard to balance. It takes money to create and you need a created game to make money. 

Rare Games Worth Money

Here is a list of games that collectors are looking for. If you have these and enjoy them DO NOT GIVE THEM AWAY! You will have a hard time replacing them if you do get rid of them. These are for all different consoles, and I'll have the console beside the name. 

- Outrun 2006 Coast to Coast (Xbox)  - Futurama the video game (PlayStation 2 and Xbox)

- Suikoden II (PlayStation 1)  - Cubivore Survival of the Fittest (gamecube)   - Shepherds Crossing  (NDS)  - Black Lamp (Sinclair ZX Spectrum)  - Haunting Ground (PlayStation 2)  

- Spelunker (commodore 64) - Kuon  (Playstation 2)  -Pokemon Box Ruby and Sapphire (gamecube)

- Ninja Five -0 (gba)  - steel battalion (Xbox)  

If you want the rest of this long list, see these links: click here and

here

Board Game Bonus

Those board games you have from your grandmother or great aunt may be worth actual money. The rare games are extremely hard to find, especially undamaged. Old TV show toys are often valuable, anyway, but these are for sure valuable. 

Photo by Worthpoint

Lost In Space is a board game and not just a TV show. It has three levels and actually looks fun. You can't move up to the next level without hitting a certain space, apparently, so it might take longer to play. At any rate, it is rare. Most Lost In Space anything is rare, if we're honest. 

Haunted House is a game where you explore a model of a haunted house to find a jewel and escape the house. The spinner gives off owl hoots for the number of spaces. This, too, looks rather fun. Different places can send you back spaces or make you start over. 

Dark Tower is a quest game where you take a scepter from an evil king. A tiny computer keeps track of who is winning. You find three keys to unlock a tower and defeat the king. 

The Game of Goose is Italian and has you moving in a spiral shape to the end, facing obstacles on the way. It is a children's game and Italian boards are especially rare. It might date back to ancient Egypt. 

Settlers of Catan is a game in other forms, but the 3D collectors edition is not common. You raid cities and trade with other players. It is a fun, good experience. Storyline is built throughout the playing time. 

Keywood is similar to the game above. Players try to control 6 villages. It has different income complexities and is kind of like some of the video games where you settle and farm small villages, only it is on paper. 

Fortune is a game of Monopoly based on New York streets. It was discontinued after Parker Brothers bought Monopoly, a few years after to be specific. It was not out long, so not many are out there. 

Photo by Worthpoint

The Elvis Presley Game is a trivia game that is not often found in good condition. It is, obviously, all about Elvis' music. If you find a copy in reasonable condition it is worth a lot. 

Be A Manager is a game where you manage a baseball team. In its entirety and with all parts in it, you could get a good price for it. 

Sources:

 https://www.goliath.com/gaming/greatest-video-game-companies-that-no-longer-exist/

https://www.lovemoney.com/gallerylist/84526/surprisingly-valuable-video-games-you-might-have-at-home

https://www.thegamer.com/console-games-rarest-ever-worth/

https://www.workandmoney.com/s/valuable-vintage-board-games-32b5423591a94861

https://howchoo.com/g/n2jkmmixn2i/rarest-video-games-of-all-time

https://www.thecoolist.com/valuable-video-games/